Preview

Modern Science and Innovations

Advanced search

THE ROLE OF SOVIET HERITAGE IN MODERN POLITICAL PROCESSES

https://doi.org/10.37493/2307-910X.2023.1.12

Abstract

The Soviet historical heritage is not only an instrument of state policy, but also a significant element of modern socio-political processes. Ideas about the Soviet national-state heritage are of great importance in shaping the political consciousness of modern Russians. Ideas about the Soviet national-state heritage are of great importance in shaping the value and worldview foundations of modern Russian identity. At present, in the scientific and public environment, there is an awareness of the need to ensure historical continuity and preserve memory based on the formation of common ideas about the Soviet past and its role in modern Russia. The state policy of memory constructs unifying meanings and narratives largely based on Soviet history and state-patriotic traditions. The Soviet legacy can be included in the construct of the value-political image of the future. Historical memory is one of the foundations for the consolidation of society in multi-ethnic and multi-confessional regions, leads to the unification of people of different generations and social strata, and has an important impact on the political processes of modern Russia. For a significant part of the population, Soviet values and social orientation, as well as the memory of the country's greatness on the world stage, are attractive landmarks that can become starting points for the project of the future.

About the Author

A. M. Erokhin
North-Caucasus Federal University
Russian Federation

  Aleksey M. Erokhin, Dc. Sci. (Soc.), Head of the Department of Philosophy

Stavropol, Pushkin Street, 1

 



References

1. Assman A. Dlinnaya ten' proshlogo. Memorial'naya kul'tura i istoricheskaya politika. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2014. 328 p.

2. Achkasov V. A. Natsional'naya identichnost' kak istoricheskii narrativ // Upravlencheskoe konsul'tirovanie. 2018. No. 10. P. 19-26.

3. Gofman I. Predstavlenie sebya drugim v povsednevnoi zhizni. M.: «Kanon-pressTS», «Kuchkovo pole», 2000. 304 p.

4. Malinova O. YU. Ofitsial'nyi istoricheskii narrativ kak ehlement politicheskoi identichnosti v Rossii: ot 1990-kh k 2010-m godam // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. 2016. No. 6. P. 139-158.

5. Miller A. Rol' ehkspertnykh soobshchestv v politike pamyati v Rossii // Gefter. 20.01.2014. URL: http:gefter.ru/archive/11115 (data obrashcheniya 13.10.2021).

6. Repina L. P. Istoricheskaya pamyat' i natsional'naya identichnost' podkhody i metody issledovaniya // Dialog so vremenem. 2016. Vyp. 54. P. 9-15.

7. Ryuzen I. Krizis, travma i identichnost' // ―Tsep' vremeN‖: problemy istoricheskogo soznaniya / Otv. red. L. P. Repina. M.: IVI RAN, 2005. P. 38-62.

8. Semenenko I. S. Novye rakursy politiki identichnosti: trudnaya pamyat' v muzeyakh istorii KHKH veka // Mirovaya ehkonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2020. Vol. 64, No. 5. P. 16-32.

9. Calhoun C. Nationalism, Political Community and the Representation of Society: Or, Why Feeling at Home is Not a Substitute for Public Space // European Journal of Social Theory. 1999. Vol. 2, No. 2. P. 217-231.

10. Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Ed. By Tajfel H. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1982. 532 p.

11. Turner J. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1987. 216 p.

12. Yadgar Y. Between ‗the Arab‘ and ‗the Religious Rightist‘: ‗Significant Others‘ in the Construction of Jewish-Israeli National Identity // Nationalism and Ethnic Politics. 2003. Vol. 9, No. 1. P. 52-74.


Review

For citations:


Erokhin A.M. THE ROLE OF SOVIET HERITAGE IN MODERN POLITICAL PROCESSES. Modern Science and Innovations. 2023;(1):115-120. https://doi.org/10.37493/2307-910X.2023.1.12

Views: 312


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2307-910X (Print)