To the question of the policy of imperial management of political processes in the Caucasus region

The political process in the North Caucasus is peripheral in terms of its significance for the Russian society. does not have a system-forming influence on the main forms and methods of ruling. It also has an ideocratic character, since the actions of the subjects of the process are normalized by ethnic and confessional norms to a greater extent than by formalized law. The imperial period of Russian influence in the Caucasus with a variety of styles and forms of political governance is considered.

Materials, methods, results and discussions.

In the presented work, a mechanism for a comparative analysis of various styles and methods of management is identified, a systematic method is used, which helps to establish the political background of ongoing political and management activities.

Conclusion.

Thus, the policy of imperial management of political processes in the Caucasus in modern political science has not been studied sufficiently deeply and diversified. The studied scientific phenomenon is much more widely represented by the works of historians, lawyers, specialists in political geography, the very process of the Caucasus entering the halo of Russian politics begins from the beginning of the 18th to the 20th centuries. In this article, an attempt was made to describe his imperial period and to personify individual state and political figures responsible for the policy pursued. The activities of Prince P. V. Tsitsianov, who was the first to try to take steps towards political transformation in the field of legislation, were given. During his reign in the Caucasus, conditions began to form for the formation of a local political and bureaucratic elite. I characterize the management model of Prince P.V. Tsitsianov, we can recognize the presence of a "European trace" in the ongoing imperial policy. The years of Yermolov's rule coincided with the protracted Caucasian War and were marked by military-power methods of control. Management policy and forms of management Vorontsova M.S. distinguished by significant, deep political and administrative reforms. Thus, the political-imperial management of political processes in the Caucasus combined various types and forms of management: from peaceful civilians, military forces, and was intended to strengthen the Russian imperial influence in the Caucasus.

1. Vasil'eva O.A. Ehtnopoliticheskie konflikty na yuzhnykh rubezhakh postsovetskoi Rossii: opyt politicheskogo upravleniya. Monografiya.-Armavir: RITSA GPA, 2011.– 260 s.

2. Vasil'eva O.A. Natsional'nye okrainy v politike Rossiiskoi imperii i russkoi obshchestvennoi mysli. – Rostov-na-Donu: Izd-vo YUNTS RAN, 2020.–608 s.

3. Vasil'eva O.A. Rossiiskii Kavkaz: problemy, poiski, resheniya. – Moskva: Izdatel'stvo «Aspekt PresS», 2015.– 600 s.

4. Khlynina T.P., Krinko E.F., Urushadze A.T. Rossiiskii Severnyi Kavkaz: istoricheskii opyt upravleniya i formirovaniya granits regiona. –Rostov-na-Donu: Izd-vo YUNTS RAN, 2012.– 272 s.

5. Khlynina T.P., Krinko E.F., Urushadze A.T. Natsional'no-gosudarstvennye preobrazovaniya na Kavkaze: opyt proshlogo i sovremennye tendentsii. // Materialy VII mezhdunarodnogo foruma istorikov-kavkazovedov (g. Rostov-na-Donu, 12-13 noyabrya 2020 g.).– Rostov-na-Donu: Izd-vo YUNTS RAN, 2020.– 464 s.

6. Vartumyan A.A. Istoricheskoe znachenie prisoedineniya Kavkaza v sostav Rossiiskoi imperii: istoriko-geopoliticheskii aspekt // Materialy vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem «Istoricheskoe nasledie vsemirnoi ehpokhi: k 300-letiyu Rossiiskoi imperiI» (4 iyulya 2021 g.).– Astrakhan', 2021.–356 s.

7. Karabushchenko P.L. Vartumyan A.A. Fal'sifikatsiya politicheskoi istorii: opyt politicheskoi germenevtiki. Monografiya.– M.: «KDU», «DobrosveT», 2020.– 374 s.

8. A.A. Vartumyan, Kornienko T.A. Traditsii v politicheskoi modernizatsii: kontseptual'nye podkhody metody i osnovaniya. // Vestnik PGLU, №1, 2012.– s.40-44.; Revolyutsiya kak kontsept i sobytiya. Monografiya.– M.: OOO «TSIUM i NA», 2015.– 184 s.

9. Vartumyan A.A. Imperskii proekt Rossii. Rusifikatsiya natsional'nykh okrain // Voprosy ehlitologii, №3, 2021.– s. 226-238.

10. Vartumyan A.A. Formirovanie Kavkazskogo napravleniya russkogo frontira v Petrovskuyu ehpokhu. // Materialy VI mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii «Petr Pervyi i imperskie praktiki frontirnogo prostranstvA» (14 noyabrya 2021 g.).– Astrakhan', 2021.

11. Raport glavnokomanduyushchego v Gruzii i na Kavkazskoi linii generala ot kavalerii A.P. Termasova voennomu ministru 12 oktyabrya 1810 g. №194 // Kavkaz i Rossiiskaya imperiya: proekty, idei, illyuzii i real'nost'. Nachalo 19-nachalo 20 vv. Sankt-Peterburg, 2005.– s.258.

12. Trifonov A.G., Mezhuev B.V. General-gubernatorstvo v rossiiskoi sisteme territorial'nogo upravleniya. // Politicheskie issledovaniya, 2000, №5.– s.22-24.

13. Fadeev A.V. Rossiya i Kavkaz v pervoi treti XIX veka.– M., 1961.– s.108.

14. Ocherki istorii prava Russkogo gosudarstva XVIII-XIX vv. (period imperii). –Moskva, 1998.– s.101.

15. Vsepoddanneishii raprt glavnokomanduyushchego v Gruzii general-leitenanta knyazya P.D. Tsitsianova 23 marta 1804 g. №7 // Kavkaz i Rossiiskaya imperiya: proekty, idei, illyuzii i real'nost'. Nachalo 19-nachalo 20 vv. SPb, 2005.– s.254-255.

16. Karabushchenko P.L., Vartumyan A.A., Shebzukhova T.A. Politicheskie ehlity Bol'shogo Kavkaza (sovremennaya ehlitologicheskaya komparativistika ). Monografiya.–M., «KDU», «DobrosveT», 2021.– s.8-33.

17. Vartumyan A.A. K voprosu kooptatsii adygskoi ehlity v peredache komplementarnykh funktsii v XV-XVIII vv. // Voprosy ehlitologii: filosofiya, kul'tura, politika, 2018. –T.16.– Astrakhan', 2018.- 196 s.

18. Gordin YA.A. Rossiya na Kavkaze: poiski resheniya // Kavkaz i Rossiiskaya imperiya: proekty, idei, illyuzii i real'nost'. Nachalo 19-nachalo 20 vv. Sankt-Peterburg, 2005.– s.558-559.

19. Shafranova O.I. Sistema upravleniya Abkhaziei v trudakh G.A. Dzidzariya // Natsional'no-gosudarstvennye preobrazovaniya na Kavkaze: opyt proshlogo i sovremennye tendentsii. // Materialy VII Mezhdunarodnogo foruma istorikov-kavkazovedov (g. Rostov-na-Donu, 12– 13 noyabrya 2020 g.) / [otv. red. akad. G.G. Matishov]. – Rostov-na-Donu: Izd-vo YUNTS RAN, 2020.– s.14-20.

20. Matveev V.A. Narodnye obyknoveniya kavkazskikh gortsev: opyt ispol'zovaniya v sisteme upravleniya i rossiiskoi retseptsii vo vtoroi polovine XIX-nachale XX v. // Materialy VII Mezhdunarodnogo foruma istorikov-kavkazovedov (g. Rostov-na-Donu, 12– 13 noyabrya 2020 g.) / [otv. red. akad. G.G. Matishov]. – Rostov-na-Donu: Izd-vo YUNTS RAN, 2020. – s. 44-54.

21. Kharsiev B.M. Ingushetiya v gosudarstvennoi pravitel'stve Rossii: ot dobrovol'nogo prisoedineniya do natsional'noi gosudarstvennosti. // Materialy VII Mezhdunarodnogo foruma istorikov-kavkazovedov (g. Rostov-na-Donu, 12– 13 noyabrya 2020 g.) / [otv. red. akad. G.G. Matishov]. – Rostov-na-Donu: Izd-vo YUNTS RAN, 2020.-s. 54-62.;

22. Shalak M.E. Malaya Nagaiskaya Orda: opyt nesostoyavsheisya gosudarstvennosti. // Materialy VII Mezhdunarodnogo foruma istorikov-kavkazovedov (g. Rostov-na-Donu, 12– 13 noyabrya 2020 g.) / [otv. red. akad. G.G. Matishov]. – Rostov-na-Donu: Izd-vo YUNTS RAN, 2020. – s. 109-118.-464 s.

23. Blieva Z.M. Sistema upravleniya na Severnom Kavkaze v kontse XVIII- pervoi treti XIX v.-Vladikavkaz, 1992.–s.186

24. Gatagova L.S., Ismail-Zaze D.I. Kavkaz // Natsional'nye okrainy Rossiiskoi imperii: stanovlenie i razvitie sistemy upravleniya.–M., 1998.– s.269.

25. Malakhova G.N. Stanovlenie i razvitie gosudarstvennogo upravleniya na Severnom Kavkaze v XVIII-XIX vv. – Rostov-na-Donu, 2001.–s.194-203