NON-INSTITUTIONAL POLITICAL PROCESS: THE ESSENCE, FEATURES
https://doi.org/10.33236/2307-910X-2019-25-1-243-248
Abstract
In any modern society, political decisions are made within the framework of a political process, which involves a variety of procedures and a variety of institutions and/or factors, both formal and informal. That is why it attracts a huge and undiminished research attention of political scientists, who consider it one of the main categories of their discipline. The General theory of the political process serves as a methodological basis for a wide variety of studies concerning both individual aspects of the process itself and other political science problems. The political process - a series of events that affect the development of the political course
About the Authors
F. Y. Shebzukhova
Karachay-Cherkess Republican Institute for Advanced Studies of Educators
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. A. Ebzeev
Parlametn of KCHR
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Kingdon J. W. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. New York: Harper Collins, 1995.
2. Sabatier P. A. Political Science and Public Policy // PS: Political Science and Politics. 1991. Vol. 24. № 2. P. 144-147.
3. Lasswell H. D. The Decision Process: Seven Categories of Functional Analysis. College Park: University of Maryland Press, 1956.
4. Brewer CD. The Policy Sciences Emerge: To Nurture and Structure a Discipline // Policy Sciences. 1974. Vol. 5. № 3. P. 239-244.
5. Wildavsky A. Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. New Brunswick: Transaction Books, 1987.
6. Sabatier P. A. Toward Better Theories of the Policy Process // PS: Political Science and Politics. 1991. Vol. 24. № 2. P. 147-156.
7. Алмонд Г. и др. Сравнительная политология сегодня: Мировой обзор. М.: Аспект Пресс, 2002. С. 81.
8. Подъячев К. В. Институт обращений граждан в органы власти в России: возможности возникновения нового канала влияния // Полис. 2007. № 5. С. 73.
9. Алмонд Г. и др. Сравнительная политология сегодня: Мировой обзор. М.: Аспект Пресс, 2002. С. 127.
10. Howlett М., McConnell A., Perl A. Streams and Stages: Reconciling Kingdon and Policy Process Theory // European Journal of Political Research. 2015. Vol. 54. № 3. P. 419-434.
11. Verba S., Nie N. H. Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper & Row, 1972. P. 2.
12. Lane R. E. Political Life: Why People Get Involved in Politics. Glencoe: The Free Press, 1959; Milbrath L.W. Political Participation: How and Why Do People Get Involved in Politics? Chicago: Rand McNally, 1965.
13. Quaranta M. Political Protest in Western Europe: Exploring the Role of Context in Political Action. Springer, 2015. P. 22.
14. Barnes S. H. et al. Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1979.
15. Parry G., Moyser G., Day N. Political Participation and Democracy in Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. P. 16.
16. Muller E. N. An Explanatory Model for Differing Types of Participation // European Journal of Political Research. 1982. Vol. 10. № LP. 1-16.
17. Marsh A. Political Action in Europe and the USA. London: Macmillan, 1990; Lavric M. et al. Youth 2010: The Social Profile of Young People in Slovenia. Maribor: Aristej Publishing House, 2011; Henn M., Foard N. Young People, Political Participation and Trust in Britain // Parliamentary Affairs. 2012. Vol. 65. № 1. P. 47-67.
18. Verba S., Nie N. H. Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper & Row, 1972. P. 44; Milbrath L.W., Goel M.L. Political Participation: How and Why Do People Get Involved in Politics? Chicago: Rand McNally, 1977. P. 20.
19. Barnes S.H. et al. Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1979. P. 538-555.
20. Parry G., Moyser G., Day N. Political Participation and Democracy in Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. P. 55.
21. Teorell J., Torcal M., Montero J.R. Political Participation: Mapping the Terrain // Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies: A Comparative Analysis / Ed. by. J.W. van Deth, J.R. Montero, A. Westholm. Abingdon: Routledge, 2007. P. 341.
22. Bourne P. A. Unconventional Political Participation in a Middle-Income Developing Country // Current Research Journal of Social Sciences. 2010. Vol. 2. № 3. P. 196-203.
23. Norris P. Count Every Voice: Democratic Participation Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. P. 16.
24. Alesina A., Wacziarg R. The Economics of Civic Trust // Disaffected Democracies: What's Troubling the Trilateral Countries? / Ed. by SJ. Pharr, R.D. Putnam. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000. P. 163.
25. Webber C, Wildavsky A. A History of Taxation and Expenditure in the Western World. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1986. P. 493.
26. Kuttner R. Everything for Sale: The Virtues and Limits of Markets. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1999. P. 329.
27. Theocharis Y., van Deth J.W. Political Participation in a Changing World: Conceptual and Empirical Challenges in the Study of Citizen Engagement. Abingdon: Routledge, 2018. P. 44-61.
28. Riley S.C.E., Griffin C, Morey Y. The Case for «Everyday Politics»: Evaluating Neo-tribal Theory as a Way to Understand Alternative Forms of Political Participation, Using Electronic Dance Music Culture as an Example // Sociology. 2010. Vol. 44. № 2. P. 345-363.
29. Diemer M.A. Fostering Marginalized Youths' Political Participation: Longitudinal Roles of Parental Political Socialization and Youth Sociopolitical Development // American Journal of Community Psychology. 2012. Vol. 50. № 1-2. P. 246-256.
30. Huntington S. P., Nelson J. M. No Easy Choice: Political Participation in Developing Countries. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1976. P. 3.
31. Verba S., Schlozman K. L., Brady H. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995. P. 38.
Review
For citations:
Shebzukhova F.Y., Ebzeev A.A. NON-INSTITUTIONAL POLITICAL PROCESS: THE ESSENCE, FEATURES. Modern Science and Innovations. 2019;(1):245-250. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33236/2307-910X-2019-25-1-243-248
Views:
63
Email this article 