Preview

Modern Science and Innovations

Advanced search

The role of wireless sensor networks in improving the efficiency of the agro-industrial complex: a systematic review

https://doi.org/10.37493/2307-910X.2026.1.2

Abstract

Introduction. The modern agro-industrial complex faces challenges that require a transition to precision, resource-saving, and adaptive management methods. Wireless sensor networks are considered a key technological foundation for the digitalization of the agro-industrial complex. However, a gap persists in the literature regarding the lack of a systematic analysis of the integration potential of WSNs and their comprehensive impact on the operational, economic, and environmental efficiency of the agro-industrial complex at all stages of the value chain.

Goal. The aim of this systematic review is a comprehensive analysis of the role of WSNs in improving the operational, economic, and environmental efficiency of the agroindustrial complex, as well as identifying key technological trends, implementation barriers, and promising directions for future research.

Materials and methods. A systematic literature review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The search for relevant publications for the period 2021–2026 was performed in the Scopus database using a defined search strategy. Study selection was carried out according to PICOS criteria, focusing on empirical works dedicated to the application of WSNs in various sectors of the agro-industrial complex. For the analysis, methods of qualitative thematic synthesis, bibliometric visualization (VOSviewer), and critical assessment of study quality were used.

Results and discussion. Five key thematic research clusters were identified, confirming their interdisciplinary nature. It was established that WSNs have a significant positive impact on the key performance indicators of the agro-industrial complex, such as increasing yield by up to 43%, saving water by up to 50% and fertilizers by up to 32%, and reducing energy consumption by up to 50%. The technological component of WSNs is evolving towards hybrid cloud-edge architectures with artificial intelligence integration. An analysis of barriers hindering the active application of this technology in the agro-industrial complex was performed.

Conclusion. WSNs are the technological core for building an efficient and sustainable agro-industrial complex. This review systematizes evidence of their positive impact on KPIs and highlights architectural and integration trends. For the full realization of WSNs' potential, further interdisciplinary research is needed, aimed at overcoming technical and economic barriers, developing standards, and creating adaptive solutions that consider local conditions.

About the Author

V. V. Samoylenko
Stavropol State Agrarian University
Russian Federation

Vladimir V. Samoylenko – Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Associate Professor, Department of Engineering and IT Solutions, 

12, Zootekhnichesky ave., Stavropol, 355000

 



References

1. Bayrakdar ME. Energy-Efficient Technique for Monitoring of Agricultural Areas with Terrestrial Wireless Sensor Networks. Journal of Circuits, Systems and Computers. 2020;29(11):2050141. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218126620501418

2. Jawad HM, Nordin R, Gharghan SK, Jawad AM, Ismail M. Energy-Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks for Precision Agriculture: A Review. Sensors. 2017;17(8):1781. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17081781

3. Kapustin SV, Khalabiya RF. System for assessing the energy efficiency of synchronous access in a wireless sensor network simulation model. Modern Science and Innovations. 2020;(1):35-39. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33236/2307-910X-2020-1-29-35-39

4. Samoylenko VV. Concept of a Multilevel Network Infrastructure for Monitoring Agricultural Facilities Based on Wireless Sensor Networks. Advanced Engineering Research. 2025;25(4):371-382. https://doi.org/10.23947/2687-1653-2025-25-4-2238

5. Anikó N, Tarek A, Arshad S, Nóra G, Miklós N, Mirzaei M, Szilárd S, Harsányi E, Al-Dalahmeh M, Mohammed S. Real-time monitoring of ammonia emissions from cereal crops using LoRaWAN-based sensing technology. Scientific Reports. 2025;16:1446. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-31661-3

6. Popli S, Jha RK, Jain S. Adaptive Small Cell position algorithm (ASPA) for green farming using NBIoT. Journal of Network and Computer Applications. 2021;173:102841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102841

7. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

8. Hosseini M-S, Jahanshahlou F, Akbarzadeh MA, Zarei M, Vaez-Gharamaleki Y. Formulating research questions for evidence-based studies. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health. 2024;2:100046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2023.100046

9. Joanna Briggs Institute. JBI critical appraisal tools. [Online]. Available: https://jbi.global/criticalappraisal-tools (accessed: 22.04.2026).

10. Arvidsson S, Dumay J. Corporate ESG reporting quantity, quality and performance: Where to now for environmental policy and practice? Business Strategy and the Environment. 2022;31(3):1091-1110. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2937

11. Alhazmy EA. Education reform and vision 2030 in Saudi Arabia: challenges and pathways. Discover Education. 2025;5:40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-01005-4

12. Rahaman MM, Azharuddin M. Wireless sensor networks in agriculture through machine learning: A survey. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2022;197:106928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.106928

13. Arefin MS, Mahin MIS, Mily FA, Sani MSH, Rehan MI, Sumon TI. AGRO AI: A compact solution for modernizing the agriculture using NASA's satellite data and artificial intelligence. Applied Food Research. 2026;6:101678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afres.2026.101678

14. Chen H, Hou G, Hua C, Wang S, Chen Z, Zhang Y. Agricultural autonomous decision-making system "Fuxi Brain" Based on generative large model fusion internet of things. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2026;244:111454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2026.111454

15. Chettri K, Sen B, Ghosal P. Deep learning for precision agriculture: a systematic review of methods, challenges, and future directions. Knowledge and Information Systems. 2026;68:35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-025-02625-w

16. Mohamed ZE, Afify MK, Badr MM, Omar OA. IoT-driven smart irrigation system to improve water use efficiency. Scientific Reports. 2026;16:2609. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-33826-6

17. Bushnag A, Chaabane SB, Harrabi R, Alharbi LA, Alshmrani M, Abuzneid S. Smart agriculture: IoTBased smart irrigation with advanced fuzzy logic control. Expert Systems with Applications. 2026;299:130168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.130168

18. Boukri Y, Hamici HS, Mansour RF, Maamar AET, Ghoneim SSM, Paramasivam P, Hashim MA, Hussein EE. Analysis and experimental implementation of affordable smart irrigation system using IoT to reduce agricultural costs and minimize water usage. Applied Water Science. 2026;16:36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-025-02727-4

19. Haggag MW, Rabie AH, Ismael I, Shaaban W. A real-time smart energy management system for greenhouses using a hybrid optimization algorithm: Experimental implementation for efficient and sustainable operation. Computers and Electrical Engineering. 2026;131:110948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2026.110948

20. Xiong T, Chen G, Cai W, Zha L, Xu G, Wang A, Wei Y, Lu X, Wei S, Lai D, Zhang J, Bao H. Design and development of a low-cost and energy-efficient container farm for leafy greens. Cleaner Engineering and Technology. 2026;30:101135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2025.101135

21. Sharma P, Thakur N. Advancing urban food sustainability: Biotechnology and IoT synergies in vertical greenhouses. Bioresource Technology Reports. 2026;33:102548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2026.102548

22. Yang N, Du R, Yu N, He W, Wang Z, Du X, Chen S. Integrated sensing and communication for lettuce water-status monitoring. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2026;242:111370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2025.111370

23. Sen K, Dey S, Ganguly A, Rajak P. Artificial intelligence in aquaculture: Advancing sustainable fish farming through AI-driven monitoring, optimization, and disease management. Aquaculture. 2026;614:743602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2025.743602

24. Ellahi RM, Wood LC, Bekhit AE-DA. A multi-layer Industry 4.0 framework for ensuring halal integrity in NZ meat supply chains. Food Control. 2026;182:111880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2025.111880

25. Asogan A, Sazali N, Veerendra AS, Samylingam L, Aslfattahi N, Kok CK, Kadirgama K. A review on the impact of AI-enabled thermal imaging and IoT sensor fusion on early detection of mastitis in dairy cattle. Biosensors and Bioelectronics: X. 2026;28:100735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosx.2025.100735

26. Kırbaş İ. AI-based automated weight prediction in cattle for herd health surveillance. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 2026;247:106752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2025.106752

27. Aroh IM, McCutcheon G, Macartan BP, Kuneš R, Curran TP, Clarke L. Monitoring ammonia emissions in pig facilities: a comparative review of measurement technologies, monitoring protocols, and technology decision-support framework. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2026;241:111238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2025.111238

28. Fu C, Zhuang Q, Tian A. An IoT-based measurement system for the quantitative analysis of soil heavy metals integrating fractional-order signal processing and multi-task learning. Measurement. 2026;260:119822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2025.119822

29. Li Z. A magnetic induction network for high-resolution, real-time soil moisture monitoring in complex subsurface environments. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2026;242:111314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2025.111314

30. Malche T, Joshi M, Upadhyay GM, Soni PK. Automated tomato leaf disease detection and alert system using Internet of Things and TinyML. Discover Internet of Things. 2025;6:8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43926-025-00257-8

31. Zarboubi M, Bellout A, Chabaa S, Dliou A. Enhancing integrated pest management with IoT and YOLO-Evo: A smart, low-cost monitoring system for sustainable apple farming. Results in Engineering. 2026;29:108850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108850

32. Fedorenko V, Samoylenko I, Samoylenko V. Energy-balanced distribution of radio modules with various technical states among positions of nodes in wireless sensor networks. AEU – International Journal of Electronics and Communications. 2021;138:153849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeue.2021.153849

33. Talaat FM, Ibrahim MA, Karim AA, Elsonbaty HK, Al-Zoghby AM. IoT-Integrated robotic system for automated plant disease detection and environmental monitoring. Scientific Reports. 2026;16:1638. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-32624-4

34. Dahmir F, Krisnowo A, Soehadi G, Widodo A, Appe J, Budiwati SV, Haryanto G, Taufik M, Karim S, Putera IP, Prabowo J, Dwiono A, Ilyas A. 5G utilization for smart farming to enhance productivity of sugarcane plantations in Indonesia. Discover Sustainability. 2025;7:86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-02073-0

35. Méndez B, Lamo P. IoT node for monitoring and traceability of live plants in maritime transport. Array. 2026;29:100621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.array.2025.100621

36. Fedorenko V, Samoylenko V, Vinogradenko A, Samoylenko I, Sharipov I, Anikuev S. Mathematical Aspects of Stable State Estimation of the Radio Equipment in Terms of Communication Channel Functioning. In: Vishnevskiy VM, Samouylov KE, Kozyrev DV, editors. Distributed Computer and Communication Networks. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 547-559. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030- 36625-4_44

37. Fedorenko V, Samoylenko I, Samoylenko V. Fragmentation of data packets in wireless sensor network with variable temperature and channel conditions. Computer Communications. 2024;214:201-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2023.12.001

38. Awlla AH, Rashid TA, Abdullah RM. A Dynamic-Weight Multi-Objective Sloth-Inspired Clustering Algorithm for Wireless Sensor Networks. International Journal of Communication Systems. 2026;39(2):e70395. https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.70395

39. Sennan S, S S, Somula R, Pandey D, Cho Y. A multi-objective grey wolf optimization algorithm for energy-efficient cluster-based routing in IoT-enabled WSNs. Scientific Reports. 2025;16:179. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-28950-2

40. Sun W, Wang H, Qin Z, Guo X. Air–Ground Collaborative Networking and Transmission Scheduling for Opportunistic UAV-Assisted Data Collection. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. 2026;13(5):4931- 4948. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2025.3637836

41. Tao X, Butcher J, Cumini C, Talasila M, Montserrat SC, Sacco A, Popp M, Marchetto G, Silvestri S. AgriSmart: An IoT-enabled framework for agricultural resource optimization. Computer Communications. 2026;248:108416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2026.108416

42. Samoylenko VV. Economic and mathematical optimization of the structure of wireless sensor networks for intensive orchards. Proceedings of Higher Educational Institutions. Series "Economics, Finance and Production Management". 2025;66:136-145. (In Russ.).

43. Paki ZS, Yakubu BM, Boukari S, Latif R, Jamail NSM, Gital AY, Fati SM. Blockchain based precision rice farming framework using deep learning techniques. Discover Internet of Things. 2025;6:5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43926-025-00264-9

44. Jain P, Alam MS, Saini MK, Aslam R. Recent technological innovations and strategies for reducing post-harvest losses during bulk grain storage: Applications of IoT and non-destructive quality evaluation. Journal of Stored Products Research. 2026;116:102893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2025.102893

45. Chen H-C, Chen S-F, Lin S-R, Lin T-T. IoT-based automated monitoring and assessment of tea shoot density using canopy imaging. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2026;241:111251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2025.111251

46. Samoylenko V, Fedorenko V, Samoylenko I. Comparative Analysis of Digital Platforms for Agriculture 4.0 in Russia: Current Level and Ways for Improvement. In: Samoylenko I, Rajabov T, editors. Innovations in Sustainable Agricultural Systems, Agriculture 4.0 and Precision Agriculture, Volume 2. Cham: Springer; 2025. p. 43-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-98127-2_4

47. Mamun Q, Zaman A, Ip RHL, Haque KMS. A bibliographic study of integrating IoT and geospatial modelling for sustainable smart agriculture in developed countries: Focus on Australia. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2026;241:111289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2025.111289

48. Mensah G, Opoku R, Davis F, Obeng GY, Kornyo O, Marfo D, Addai M, Damptey J, Wetajega SD. Machine learning-assisted innovative charging strategy for e-mobility in rural communities operated by redundant energy on solar PV mini-grids. Energy Conversion and Management: X. 2026;30:101591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2026.101591


Review

For citations:


Samoylenko V.V. The role of wireless sensor networks in improving the efficiency of the agro-industrial complex: a systematic review. Modern Science and Innovations. 2026;(1):25-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37493/2307-910X.2026.1.2

Views: 134

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2307-910X (Print)