Procrastination and Tolerance for Uncertainty in Modern Scientific Discourse

Introduction. The current social reality is characterized by a high degree of uncertainty and unpredictability, which significantly increases the demands on individuals' adaptive abilities. In the context of global instability, research on maladaptive behavioral patterns, including the phenomenon of procrastination, has gained significant attention. Procrastination, as a cognitive-behavioral avoidance strategy, can lead to serious negative consequences, such as decreased productivity, emotional exhaustion, and feelings of personal failure. Chronic procrastination is often rooted in an individual's underlying inability to effectively cope with uncertainty. This relationship is an important subject of theoretical analysis, allowing us to gain a deeper understanding of the mechanisms that shape procrastination behavior.

Materials and methods. The methodological basis of this theoretical study is systemic analysis, which allowed us to consider the phenomena of procrastination and tolerance to uncertainty as complex, multi-component constructs that are in dynamic interaction. Within this approach, a comprehensive approach was implemented, including general scientific and theoretical- psychological methods, which ensured a comprehensive study of the phenomena under investigation and their relationships. Results and discussion. The subjective attitude of an individual towards various aspects of human existence is a fundamental element of mental organization that serves as an important link between the objective manifestations of the mind and the individual's internal position. In the context of this analysis, procrastination should be viewed not as an autonomous phenomenon but rather as a behavioral symptom caused by a low tolerance for uncertainty. Conclusion. A theoretical analysis has shown that low tolerance for uncertainty predicts procrastination, creating a cognitive-affective basis. The main mechanisms include anxiety, perfectionism, expectations of failure, and a lack of flexible planning. A comprehensive approach is important for combating procrastination, including the development of tolerance for uncertainty. Effective methods include CBT, decision-making training, emotional regulation techniques, and exposure therapy. Research prospects include the empirical validation of the model and the development of programs for developing tolerance for uncertainty.

1. Aristova, I. L. Issledovanie akademicheskoi prokrastinatsii u studentov vuza / I. L. Aristova, N. S. Gorbach // Mir pedagogiki i psikhologii. – 2020. – № 4(45). – S. 118-125.

2. Rean A.A. Practical Personality Diagnostics: Textbook.-SPb; Publishing House of St. Petersburg University, 2001. 224 p.

3. Valiullina Evgeniya Viktorovna Lokus vosprinimaemogo kontrolya i uroven' prokrastinatsii // Kontsept. 2018. №8.

4. Gavril'eva, Z. N. Tolerantnost' k neopredelennost'i v psikhologicheskoi nauke / Z. N. Gavril'eva // Vestnik sovremennykh issledovanii. – 2019. – № 1.11(28). – S. 34-36.

5. Zakhartseva, A. V. Osobennosti lokusa kontrolya u studentov, prozhivayushchikh s roditelyami i v obshchezhitii / A. V. Zakhartseva // Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskie vyzovy sovremennogo obshchestva. Problemy. Perspektivy. Puti razvitiya: Materialy VI Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno- prakticheskoi konferentsii, Bryansk, 22 aprelya 2021 goda. – Bryansk: Bryanskii gosudarstvennyi universitet imeni akademika I.G. Petrovskogo, 2021. – S. 128-131.

6. Zobnina, T. V. Issledovanie lokusa kontrolya u studentov - budushchikh pedagogov / T. V. Zobnina, L. P. Kislyakova // Pedagogika, psikhologiya i obrazovanie: vyzovy i perspektivy: Sbornik statei po itogam Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, Perm', 23 avgusta 2018 goda. – Perm': Obshchestvo s ogranichennoi otvetstvennost'yu "Agentstvo mezhdunarodnykh issledovanii", 2018. – S. 36-39.

7. Il'in, A. V. Kak rabotaet prokrastinatsiya / A. V. Il'in, M. N. Sidorenko // Nauchnye issledovaniya 2022: Sbornik statei II Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, Penza, 30 iyulya 2022 goda. – Penza: Nauka i Prosveshchenie (IP Gulyaev G.YU.), 2022. – S. 81-83.

8. Kozlovskaya, D. I. Lokus kontrolya i ego vzaimosvyaz' so stremleniem k samoaktualizatsii u studentov / D. I. Kozlovskaya, S. N. Kozlovskaya // Tsennostnye orientatsii molodezhi v usloviyakh modernizatsii sovremennogo obshchestva: Materialy Vserossiiskoi s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, Gorno-Altaisk, 12 dekabrya 2020 goda / Pod redaktsiei G.YU. Lizunovoi. – Gorno-Altaisk: Gorno-Altaiskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, 2020. – S. 356-368.

9. Kolesnikova, V. I. Teoreticheskii analiz fenomena prokrastinatsii v paradigme glubinnoi psikhologii / V. I. Kolesnikova, YU. S. Denisenko // Psikhologiya i pedagogika v Krymu: puti razvitiya. – 2020. – № 2. – S. 155-172.

10. Kornilova T. V. Novyi oprosnik tolerantnosti-intolerantnosti k neopredelennosti // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. – 2010. – №6.

11. Matinova, E. V. Ponyatie prokrastinatsii v psikhologii / E. V. Matinova // Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya Rossii: Molodezhnyi vzglyad v budushchee : Sbornik nauchnykh statei 5-i Vserossiiskoi nauchnoi konferentsii. V 4-kh tomakh, Kursk, 20–21 oktyabrya 2022 goda / Otv. redaktor A.A. Gorokhov. Tom 2. – Kursk: Yugo-Zapadnyi gosudarstvennyi universitet, 2022. – S. 57-59.

12. Repenko, M. S. Tolerantnost' k neopredelennosti i trevozhnost' kak faktory prinyatiya resheniya v usloviyakh neopredelennosti / M. S. Repenko, N. V. Ustinova // Lichnostnye i situatsionnye determinanty povedeniya i deyatel'nosti cheloveka : Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno- prakticheskoi konferentsii, posvyashchennoi 80-letiyu V.D. Potapovoi, Donetsk, 08 dekabrya 2022 goda. – Donetsk: Donetskii natsional'nyi universitet, 2022. – S. 115-120.

13. Rooz, V. S. Tolerantnost' k neopredelennosti i psikhologicheskoe zdorov'e podrostkov / V. S. Rooz // Aspirant. – 2021. – № 1(58). – S. 200-202.

14. Ryazhkin, A. O. Osobennosti sub"ektivnogo otnosheniya lichnosti k znachimym tsennostyam u studentov vuza / A. O. Ryazhkin // Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta. – 2022. – T. 10, № 3(40). – DOI 10.26795/2307-1281-2022-10-3-10.

15. Yudeeva T. YU., Garanyan N. G., Zhukova D. N. Aprobatsiya oprosnika studencheskoi prokrastinatsii // Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika. – 2011. – №2.

16. Doğanülkü, H., Korkmaz, O., Griffiths, M., & Pakpour, A. (2021). Fear of COVID-19 lead to procrastination among Turkish university students: The mediating role of intolerance of uncertainty. BMC Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-021-00681-9

17. Azimi, S., Milne, G., & Miller, E. (2020). Why do consumers procrastinate and what happens next?. Journal of Consumer Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcm-07-2019-3329

18. Vives, M., & FeldmanHall, O. (2018). Tolerance to ambiguous uncertainty predicts prosocial behavior. Nature Communications, 9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04631-9

19. Sagone, E., & Indiana, M. (2023). The Roles of Academic Self-Efficacy and Intolerance of Uncertainty on Decisional Procrastination in University Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13050476 (2022). Role of Decision-Making Styles and Intolerance of Uncertainty on Procrastination During the Pandemic.

20. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v22i17.5655 Lillemo, S. (2014). Measuring the effect of procrastination and environmental awareness on households' energysaving behaviours: An empirical approach. Energy Policy, 66, 249-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.077

21. Miller, A., Bravo, D., Arnold, E., Rincon, B., & Murray, C. (2024). Examining social support and procrastination among college students. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1425524

22. Khoury-Malhame, M., Malhab, S., Chaaya, R., Sfeir, M., & Khoury, S. (2024). Coping during socio- political uncertainty. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1267603

23. Lim, A., & Javadpour, S. (2021). Into the Unknown: Uncertainty and Procrastination in Students From a Life History Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717380

24. Fourtounas, A., & Thomas, S. (2016). Cognitive factors predicting checking, procrastination and other maladaptive behaviours: Prospective versus Inhibitory Intolerance of Uncertainty. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 9, 30-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2016.02.003