Ethics of care: AI as a tool for social support of vulnerable population groups
https://doi.org/10.37493/2307-910X.2025.3.14
Abstract
Introduction. The relevance of this study is determined by the process of introducing artificial intelligence into socio-economic processes, accompanied by increased attention to the ethical aspects and risk assessments of its use. Based on the normative theory - the ethics of care, the authors tried to find out how artificial intelligence technology can be used to help vulnerable groups of the population, especially the elderly. Materials and methods. The ethics of care, as well as the concept of "Care-Centered Value-Sensitive Design" (CCVSD), which assesses the social consequences of the introduction of technologies, are used as a methodology for studying the interaction of man and technology in the field of medicine and social support. Results and discussion. The work distinguishes two main types of artificial intelligence as a tool and assistant: auxiliary assistive robotics and mobile applications, chatbots, including the function of the medical decision support system (MDSS). The authors conclude that along with the benefits of implementing AI algorithms, such as increasing the efficiency of disease diagnostics, helping to monitor the cognitive state of the elderly, there are also certain risks. It is noted that the loss of the human factor, delegating the function of support and care for a person to technologies can dehumanize this area, which is based, among other things, on empathy and trust. It is emphasized that trust can be undermined due to the ethical bias of the algorithms used, violation of confidentiality, leakage of personal data, the problem of misinformation, summing up the results according to the wrong algorithm. Conclusion.The authors conclude that the balance between technology and human experience is an important component of the successful development of healthcare and social support, and AI technologies should only complement care and concern for a person, and not replace it.
Keywords
About the Authors
L. R. MirkushinaРоссия
Liya R. Mirkushina – PhD (Philosophy), Associate professor, Chair of Philosophy and Sociology
Scopus ID: 58575231600
Researcher ID: AEP-0238-2022
9, Sadovaya-Kudrunskaya Str., Moscow, 125993
S. M. Frolova
Россия
Svetlana M. Frolova – Doctor of Sciences (Philosophy), Professor, Chair of Philosophy and Sociology, Docent (Associate Professor)
9, Sadovaya-Kudrunskaya Str., Moscow, 125993
References
1. Gilligan C. In a Different Voice. Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Camb. (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 1982; 184 p.
2. Artem'eva O.V. Ehtika zaboty: feministskaya al'ternativa klassicheskoi filosofii // Ehticheskaya mysl': Ezhegodnik. 2000. M.: IF RAN. S. 195—215.
3. Fineman M., Fineman J.W. Vulnerability and the Legal Organization of Work (Gender in Law, Culture, and Society): Routledge, First edition, 2017. 414 p.
4. Wisner B., Adams J. Environmental health in emergencies and disasters. A Practical Guide. Malta, 2002. 252 p.
5. Kiss M. European Parliamentary Research Service/EPRS. Vulnerable social groups: Before and after the crisis. Members' Research Service, 2016. 8 p.
6. Kovaleva A.V., Bodnar D.A. Nemeditsinskie problemy uyazvimykh grupp naseleniya v usloviyakh statsionarnogo lecheniya: analiz i rekomendatsii // Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya. 2023. № 9. S. 52–60. https://doi.org/10.24158/tipor.2023.9.6
7. Seredkina E.V., Grunval'd A. Ehticheskie problemy v oblasti assistivnoi robototekhniki dlya pozhilykh lyudei: filosofskie vs ehmpiricheskie issledovaniya // Tekhnologos. 2023. № 4. S. 48–59. https://doi.org/10.15593/perm.kipf/2023.4.04
8. Yuan Sh., Coghlan S., Lederman R. Ethical Design of Social Robots in Aged Care: A Literature Review Using an Ethics of Care Perspective// International Journal of Social Robotics. 2023. № 15. P. 1637–1654.
9. Tronto J. C. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. London: Psychology Press, 1993. 226 p.
10. Abdi J, Al-Hindawi A, Ng T, et al. Scoping review on the use of socially assistive robot technology in elderly care. // BMJ Open. 2018. №8 (2). P.1-20. https://doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018815
11. Broadbent E., K. Loveys J Aging. ElliQ, an AI-Driven Social Robot to Alleviate Loneliness: Progress and Lessons Learned, E. // Res & Lifestyle. 2024. №13. P. 22-28/. http://dx.doi.org/10.14283/jarlife.2024.2
12. Yashinski M. Social robot for at-home cognitive monitoring // Science Robotics. 2024. Vol. 9. № 94. http://doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.adt0930
13. V stolichnykh bol'nitsakh poyavilis' roboty-pomoshchniki — robokoshki [Ehlektronnyi resurs]. URL:https://www.mos.ru/news/item/132424073/ (data obrashcheniya: 20.05.2025).
14. Weidener L, Fischer M. Role of Ethics in Developing AI-Based Applications in Medicine: Insights From Expert Interviews and Discussion of Implications// JMIR AI. 2024. №3. http://doi:10.2196/51204
15. Owens, O.L, Felder, T. et al. Evaluation of a Computer-based Decision Aid for Promoting Informed Prostate Cancer Screening Decisions Among African American Men: iDecide, American Journal of Health Promotion. 2019. № 33 (2), pp. 267–278. http://doi:10.1177/0890117118786866
16. Joshu, E. Toddler Whose Symptoms Puzzled 17 Doctors for Three yeard is Finally Diag nosed With Rare Condition… by ChatGPT. [Ehlektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-12509111/ChatGPT-diagnosis-rare-condition.html, accessed on 22.04.2025].
17. Perelygin V, Kamelin A, Syzrantsev N, Shaheen L, Kim A, Plotnikov N, Ilinskaya A, Ilinsky V, Rakitko A and Poptsova M. Deep learning captures the effect of epistasis in multifactorial diseases. // Front. Med. 2025. №11 http://doi:10.3389/fmed.2024.147971
18. Li B. AI in Oncology: When Science Fiction Meets Reality// Artificial Intelligence in Oncology. 2018. Vol. 1. № 1. P 1–2.
19. Jaakola J. Ethics by other means? Care robot trials as ethics in-practice. // Tecnoscienza. 2020. Vol.11. №2(2). P. 53–72. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2038-3460/17477
20. Peabody F.W. The Care of the Patient. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1927. Vol. 88, P. 877–882.
21. Vvedenskaya E.V. Tsifrovye agenty v meditsine: novye vozmozhnosti i vyzovy. //Ehticheskaya mysl'. 2024. T.24. №1. S.115-129 https://:doi.org/10.21146/2074-4870-2024-24-1-115-128
22. Obermeyer, Z. et al. Dissecting Racial Bias in an Algorithm Used to Manage the Health of Populations// Science. 2019. № 366. P. 447–453. https://: doi.org/:10.1126/science.aax2342
Review
For citations:
Mirkushina L.R., Frolova S.M. Ethics of care: AI as a tool for social support of vulnerable population groups. Modern Science and Innovations. 2025;(3):135-143. https://doi.org/10.37493/2307-910X.2025.3.14
JATS XML
















