Methods of structural-parametric synthesis of autonomous underwater vehicles designed to solve problems in the interests of the mineral resources complex
https://doi.org/10.37493/2307-910X.2025.1.2
Abstract
This paper presents the conclusions drawn from a study of the development process of autonomous unmanned underwater vehicles (AUV). The study reveals that the development of AUV is a complex and multidisciplinary process involving a wide range of technical and non-technical factors. It also highlights the challenges and constraints that slow down the development process. Based on these findings, the article makes several recommendations to improve the AUV development process, such as using modular and scalable designs, setting clear goals, forming partnerships, and collaborating with regulatory and policy agencies. Adopting these recommendations can significantly improve the development process and bring new and innovative AUV technologies to the market, further advancing the field of AUV development. Overall, this study provides valuable insight into the complexities of AUV development and identifies opportunities for improvement that can accelerate the development of new technologies for AUV.
About the Authors
D. A. Pervukhin
Saint Petersburg Mining University of Empress Catherine II
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dmitry A. Pervukhin, Dr. Sci. (Techn.)
Saint Petersbur
D. D. Kotov
Saint Petersburg Mining University of Empress Catherine II
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dmitry D. Kotov, 3rd year Postgraduate Student
Saint Petersbur
Yu. M. Iskanderov
Saint Petersburg Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yuri M. Iskanderov, Dr. Sci. (Techn.), Professor
Saint Petersburg
References
1. Carreras M, Palomeras N, Ridao P, Ribas D. Design of a mission control system for an AUV. Int J Control. 2007;80(7):993-1007.
2. Eiler JH, Grothues TH, Dobarro JA, Masuda MM. Comparing Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) and Vessel-based Tracking Performance for Locating Acoustically Tagged Fish. Marine Fisheries Review. 2014;75(4):27-42.
3. Hoth J, Kowalczyk W. Determination of Flow Parameters of a Water Flow Around an AUV Body. Robotics. 2019;8(1):5.
4. Yokota S, Kim K, Imasato M, Sawada K. Development and sea trial of an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle equipped with a sub-bottom profiler for surveying mineral resources. 2016 IEEE/OES Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUV). IEEE; 2016;81-84.
5. Allotta B, Conti R, Costanzi R, Fanelli F. A low cost autonomous underwater vehicle for patrolling and monitoring. In Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment. 2017;231(3):740-749.
6. Brito MP, Griffiths G, Challenor P. Risk Analysis for Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Operations in Extreme Environments. Risk Analysis. 2010;30(12):1771-1788.
7. Furlong ME, McPhail SD, Stevenson P. A Concept Design for an Ultra-Long-Range Survey Class AUV. OCEANS 2007 - Europe. IEEE; 2007;1-6.
8. Yoshida H, Aoki T, Yamamoto I, Tsukioka S, et al. A working AUV for scientific research. Oceans ’04 MTS/IEEE Techno-Ocean ’04 (IEEE Cat. No. 04CH37600). IEEE; 2004;863-868.
9. Foster SD, Hosack GR, Hill NA, Barett NS. Choosing between strategies for designing surveys: autonomous underwater vehicles. Methods Ecol Evol. 2014;5(3):287-297.
10. Kukulya AL, Belingham J, Kaeli JW, Reddy CS, et al. Development of a propeller driven long range autonomous underwater vehicle (LRAUV) for under-ice mapping of oil spills and environmental hazards: An Arctic Domain Center of Awareness project (ADAC). In 2016 IEEE/OES Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUV). IEEE, 2016. P. 95–100.
11. Allotta B, Allotta B, Bartolini F, Pugi L, et al. Preliminary design and fast prototyping of an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle propulsion system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment. 2015;229(3):248-272.
12. Camilli R, Reddy CM, Yoerger D, Mooy BV, et al. Tracking Hydrocarbon Plume Transport and Biodegradation at Deepwater Horizon. Science (1979). 2010;330(6001):201-204.
13. Niu H, Adams S, Kenneth L, Husain T, et al. Applications of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles in Offshore Petroleum Industry Environmental Effects Monitoring. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology. 2009;48(05):12-16.
14. Wang B, Wan L, Xu Yu, Qin Z. Modeling and simulation of a mini AUV in spatial motion. Journal of Marine Science and Application. 2009;8(1):7-12.
15. Che G, Yu Z. Neural-network estimators based fault-tolerant tracking control for AUV via ADP with rudders faults and ocean current disturbance. Neurocomputing. 2020;411:442-454.
16. Ridao P, Yun J, Battle J, Sugihara K. On AUV control architecture. In Proceedings. 2000 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2000) (Cat. No. 00CH37113). IEEE; 2000;855-860.
17. Silvestre C, Pascoal A. Control of the INFANTE AUV using gain scheduled static output feedback. Control Eng Pract. 2004;12(12):1501-1509.
18. Kao M, Weitzel G, Zheng X, Black M. A simple approach to planning and executing complex AUV missions. Proceedings of the 1992 Symposium on Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Technology. IEEE; 1992;95-102.
19. Sans-Muntadas A, Kelasidi E, Pettersen KY, Brekke E. Learning an AUV docking maneuver with a convolutional neural network. IFAC Journal of Systems and Control. 2019;8:100049.
20. Lapierre L. Robust diving control of an AUV. Ocean Engineering. 2009;36(1):92-104.
21. Wynn RB, Huvenne VA, Bas TL, Murton BJ, et al. Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs): Their past, present and future contributions to the advancement of marine geoscience. Mar Geol. 2014;352:451-468.
22. Bozhenov YuA. Use of Autonomous Unmanned Underwater Vehicles for Arctic and Antarctic Research. Fundamental and Applied Hydrophysics. 2011;47-68. (In Russ.).
23. Bardachevsky NN, Bezsudnov EYu. Status and Prospects of Unmanned Underwater Vehicles Application in Hydrographic Research and Underwater Navigation. Inter Expo Geo-Siberia. 2013. (In Russ.).
24. Laverov NP, Dmitrievsky AN, Bogoyavlensky VI. Fundamental Aspects of Oil and Gas Resource Development on the Russian Arctic Shelf. Arctic: Ecology and Economics. 2011;(1):26-37. (In Russ.).
25. Xiang X, Yu C, Qin Xh, Wilson Ph, et al. Manoeuvring-based actuation evaluation of an AUV with control surfaces and through-body thrusters. Applied Ocean Research. 2020;96:102046.
26. Mesarovich M, Mako D, Takahara I. Theory of hierarchical multilevel systems. Moscow: Mir; 1973. (In Russ.).
27. Fadel M, Rabie M, Youssef A. Modeling, Simulation and Control of a Fly-by-wire Flight Control System Using Classical PID and Modified PI-D Controllers. Journal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés. 2019;52(3):267-276.
28. Aguirre F, Vargas S, Valdes D, Tornero J. State of the Art of Parameters for Mechanical Design of an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle. International Journal of Oceans and Oceanography. 2017;11(1):89-103.
29. JM K, Sulthan SM, Ahamed T, Shafeeque KM. Design and Simulation of Stand-alone DC Microgrid with Energy Storage System. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Techniques in Control, Optimization and Signal Processing (INCOS). IEEE; 2019;1-5.
30. Ge H, Chen G, Xu G. Multi-AUV Cooperative Target Hunting Based on Improved Potential Field in a Surface-Water Environment. Applied Sciences. 2018;8(6):973.
31. Brooks R. A robust layered control system for a mobile robot. IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation. 1986;2(1):14-23.
32. Gao Z, Huang Y, Han J. An alternative paradigm for control system design. In Proceedings of the 40<sup>th</sup> IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No. 01CH37228). IEEE; 2001;4578-4585.
33. Panda JP, Mitra A, Warrior HV. A review on the hydrodynamic characteristics of autonomous underwater vehicle. In Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment. 2021;235(1):15-29.
34. Austin TC, Stokey RP, Sharp KM. Paradigm: a buoy-based system for AUV navigation and tracking. OCEANS 2000 MTS/IEEE Conference and Exhibition. In Conference Proceedings (Cat. No. 00CH37158). IEEE; 2000:935-938.
35. Gasparoto HF, Chocron O, Benbouzid M, Meirelles RS. Magnetic design and analysis of a radial reconfigurable magnetic coupling thruster for vectorial AUV propulsion. IECON 2017 - 43<sup>rd</sup> Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society. IEEE; 2017;2876-2881.
36. Smith RN, Chao Y, Li P, Caron DA. Planning and Implementing Trajectories for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles to Track Evolving Ocean Processes Based on Predictions from a Regional Ocean Model. Int J Rob Res. 2010;29(12):1475-1497.
37. Roper DT, Sharma S, Sutton R, Culverhouse P. A review of developments towards biologically inspired propulsion systems for autonomous underwater vehicles. In Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment. 2011;225(2):77-96.
38. Zong G, Sun H, Nguang SK. Decentralized Adaptive Neuro-Output Feedback Saturated Control for INS and Its Application to AUV. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2021;32(12):5492-5501.
39. Zhang T, Chen L, Li Y. AUV Underwater Positioning Algorithm Based on Interactive Assistance of SINS and LBL. Sensors. 2015;16(1):42.
40. Yun X, Bachmann ER, McGhee RB, Whalen RH. Testing and evaluation of an integrated GPS/INS system for small AUV navigation. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering. 1999;24(3):396-404.
41. Eichhorn M, Ament C, Jacobi M, Pfutzenreuteret T. Modular AUV System with Integrated Real-Time Water Quality Analysis. Sensors. 2018;18(5):1837.
42. Kemna S, Gamilton MJ, Hughes DT, Lepage KD. Adaptive autonomous underwater vehicles for littoral surveillance. Intell Serv Robot. 2011;4(4):245-258.
43. Khan J, Cho H.-S. A Distributed Data-Gathering Protocol Using AUV in Underwater Sensor Networks. Sensors. 2015;15(8):19331-19350.
44. Li D, Du L. AUV Trajectory Tracking Models and Control Strategies: A Review. J Mar Sci Eng. 2021;9(9):1020.
45. Hou G, Gong L, Huang C, Zhang J. Novel fuzzy modeling and energy-saving predictive control of coordinated control system in 1000 MW ultra-supercritical unit. ISA Trans. 2019;86:48-61.
46. Mendez A, Leo T, Herreros M. Current State of Technology of Fuel Cell Power Systems for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles. Energies (Basel). 2014;7(7):4676-4693.
47. Kan T, Mai R, Mercier PP, Mi CC. Design and Analysis of a Three-Phase Wireless Charging System for Lightweight Autonomous Underwater Vehicles. In IEEE Trans Power Electron. 2018;33(8):6622-6632.
48. Petillot YR, Antonelli G, Casalino G, Ferreira F. Underwater Robots: From Remotely Operated Vehicles to Intervention-Autonomous Underwater Vehicles. IEEE Robot Autom Mag. 2019;26(2):94-101.
49. Wakita N, Hirokawa K, Ichikawa T, Yamauchi Yo. Development of Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) for Exploring Deep Sea Marine Mineral Resources. 2010;47(3).
50. Doyle J. Structured uncertainty in control system design. In 1985 24<sup>th</sup> IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. IEEE; 1985;260-265.
51. Jia L, Zhu Z. Improved Fractional-Order Integral Sliding Mode Control for AUV Based on RBF Neural network. 2019 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC). IEEE; 2019;4809-4814.
52. Ru J, Yu Sh, Wu H, Li Yu. A Multi-AUV Path Planning System Based on the Omni-Directional Sensing Ability. J Mar Sci Eng. 2021;9(8):806.
53. Mao Y, Gao F, Zhang Q, Yang Z. An AUV Target-Tracking Method Combining Imitation Learning and Deep Reinforcement Learning. J Mar Sci Eng. 2022;10(3):383.
54. Fujii T, Ura T. Development of motion control system for AUV using neural nets. Symposium on Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Technology. IEEE; 1990;81-86.
55. Ang KH, Chong G, Yun L. PID control system analysis, design, and technology // IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology. 2005;13(4):559-576.
56. Tabataba’i-Nasab FS, Keymasi KA, Moosavian SAA. Adaptive nonlinear control of an autonomous underwater vehicle. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control. 2019;41(11):3121-3131.
57. Wang J, Xu T, Wang Z. Adaptive Robust Unscented Kalman Filter for AUV Acoustic Navigation. Sensors. 2019;20(1):60.
58. Klein I, Diamant R. Observability Analysis of DVL/PS Aided INS for a Maneuvering AUV. Sensors. 2015;15(10):26818-26837.
59. Pshikhopov VKh, Medvedev M, Gaiduk AR, Gurenko BV. Control System Design for Autonomous Underwater Vehicle. In 2013 Latin American Robotics Symposium and Competition, Arequipa, Peru. IEEE; 2013;77-82.
60. Liu L, Wang J, Zhang L, Zhang Sh. Multi-AUV Dynamic Maneuver Countermeasure Algorithm Based on Interval Information Game and Fractional-Order DE. Fractal and Fractional. 2022;6(5):235.
61. Liu S, Xu S, Lim Y, Gao L. Visual Navigation for Recovering an AUV by Another AUV in Shallow Water. Sensors. 2019;19(8):1889.
62. Xiang X, Jouvencel B, Parodi O. Coordinated Formation Control of Multiple Autonomous Underwater Vehicles for Pipeline Inspection. Int J Adv Robot Syst. 2010;7(1):3.
63. Yan Z, Li J, Wu Y, Zhang J. A Real-Time Path Planning Algorithm for AUV in Unknown Underwater Environment Based on Combining PSO and Waypoint Guidance. Sensors. 2018;19(1):20.
64. Yuan C, Licht S, He H. Formation Learning Control of Multiple Autonomous Underwater Vehicles With Heterogeneous Nonlinear Uncertain Dynamics. IEEE Trans Cybern. 2018;48(10):2920-2934.
65. Jianya Yu, Wang H, Zhang H, Lin C, et al. AUV Obstacle Avoidance Planning Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning. J Mar Sci Eng. 2021;9(11):1166.
66. Sun Y, Ran X, Zhang C, Xu H, et al. AUV 3D Path Planning Based on the Improved Hierarchical Deep Q Network. J Mar Sci Eng. 2020;8(2):145.
67. Cavallo E, Michelini RC, Filaretov VF. Conceptual Design of an AUV Equipped with a Three Degrees of Freedom Vectored Thruster. J Intell Robot Syst. 2004;39(4):365-391.
68. Hai H, Zexing Z, Jiyong L, Qirong T. Investigation on the mechanical design and manipulation hydrodynamics for a small sized, single body and streamlined I-AUV. Ocean Engineering. 2019;186:106106.
69. Pambudi WS, Alfianto E, Rachman A, Hapsari DP. Simulation design of trajectory planning robot manipulator. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics. 2019;8(1):196-205.
70. Phillips AB, Turnock SR, Furlong M. The Use of Computational Fluid Dynamics to Aid Cost-Effective Hydrodynamic Design of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment. 2010;224(4):239-254.
71. Katysheva E. Analysis of the Interconnected Development Potential of the Oil, Gas and Transport Industries in the Russian Arctic. Energies (Basel). 2023;16(7):3124.
72. Marinina O, Nechitailo A, Stroykov G, Tsvetkova A, et al. Technical and Economic Assessment of Energy Efficiency of Electrification of Hydrocarbon Production Facilities in Underdeveloped Areas. Sustainability. 2023;15(12):9614.
73. Afanaseva O, Bezukhov O, Pervukhin D, Tukeev D. Experimental Study Results Processing Method for the Marine Diesel Engines Vibration Activity Caused by the Cylinder-Piston Group Operations. Inventions. 2023;8(3):71.
74. Pershin IM, Papsuh EG, Kukharova TV, Utkin VA. Modeling of Distributed Control System for Network of Mineral Water Wells. Water (Basel). 2023;15(12):2289.
75. Katysheva EG. Application of BigData technology to improve the efficiency of Arctic shelf fields development. In IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2021;937(4):042080.
76. Marinina O, Kirsanova N, Nevskaya M. Circular Economy Models in Industry: Developing a Conceptual Framework. Energies (Basel). 2022;15(24):9376.
77. Katysheva E. Creation of the integrated field model to increase the oil and gas assets management. 2020;153-160.
78. Marinina O, Tsvetkova A, Vasilev Yu, Komendantova N, et al. Evaluating the Downstream Development Strategy of Oil Companies: The Case of Rosneft. Resources. 2022;11(1):4.
79. Ilyushin YV. Development of a Process Control System for the Production of High-Paraffin Oil. Energies (Basel). 2022;15(17):6462.
80. Eremeeva AM, Kondrasheva M, Khasanov A, Oleynik IL. Environmentally Friendly Diesel Fuel Obtained from Vegetable Raw Materials and Hydrocarbon Crude. Energies (Basel). 2023;16(5):2121.
81. Kondrasheva N, Eremeeva A. Production of biodiesel fuel from vegetable raw materials. Journal of Mining Institute. 2023;260:248-256.
82. Eremeeva A, Kondrasheva N, Nelkenbaum K. Studying the possibility of improving the properties of environmentally friendly diesel fuels. In Scientific and Practical Studies of Raw Material Issues. CRC Press; 2019;108-113.
83. Litvinenko V, Petrov EI, Vasilevskaya DV, Yakovenko AV, et al. Assessment of the role of the state in the management of mineral resources. Journal of Mining Institute. 2022;259. Online first.
84. Bykowa E, Khaykin M, Shabaeyva Yu, Beloboroodva M. Development of methodology for economic evaluation of land plots for the extraction and processing of solid minerals. Journal of Mining Institute.
Review
For citations:
Pervukhin D.A., Kotov D.D., Iskanderov Yu.M. Methods of structural-parametric synthesis of autonomous underwater vehicles designed to solve problems in the interests of the mineral resources complex. Modern Science and Innovations. 2025;(1):18-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37493/2307-910X.2025.1.2
Views:
105
Email this article 