THE POLITICAL PARTICIPATION DURING THE FIGHT AGAINST COVID- 19: INTERNATIONAL RETROSPECTION
https://doi.org/10.37493/2307-910X.2023.1.18
Abstract
In the article the authors consider the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on political participation. They prove that restrictive measures in some states have increased the popularity of ultra-right political forces, transformed the models of political participation in favor of an unconventional form, and also led to the strengthening of authoritarian tendencies and, consequently, the restriction of political participation.
About the Authors
S. A. Nefedov
Pyatigorsk State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergei A. Nefedov, Dc. Sci. (Polit.), research fellow
9 Kalinin Avenue, 357532, Pyatigorsk, Stavropol Krai,
D. N. Vladimir
Sevastopol State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir D. Nechaev, Dc. Sci. (Polit.), Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Oriental and African Studies
33 Universitetskaya Str., Sevastopol, 299053
I. I. Gandaloev
Ingush State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Islam I. Gandaloev, Senior Lecturer
7 I.B. Zyazikov Avenue, 386001 Magas, Republic of Ingushetia
References
1. Theocharis Y., Deth J.W. Political Participation in a Changing World: Conceptual and Empirical Challenges in the Study of Citizen Engagement. Abingdon: Routledge, 2018.
2. Milbrath L.W. Political Participation: How and Why Do People Get Involved in Politics? Chicago: Rand McNally & Co., 1965.
3. Peters Y. Political Participation, Diffused Governance, and the Transformation of Democracy: Patterns of Change. Abingdon: Routledge, 2018.
4. Boin A., McConnell A., Hart P. Governing the Pandemic: The Politics of Navigation a Mega-Crisis. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021.
5. Guriev S., Treisman D. Informational Autocrats // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2019. Vol. 33, No. 4. P. 100-127.
6. Lipset S.M., Rokkan S. Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction // Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives / Ed. by S.M. Lipset, S. Rokkan. New York: The Free Press, 1967. P. 1-64.
7. Marks G. et al. Cleavage Theory // The Palgrave Handbook of EU Crises / Ed. by M. Riddervold, J. Trondal, A. Newsome. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021. P. 173-193.
8. Barakhvostov P.A. COVID-19 i fenomen tsifrovogo avtoritarizma // Sovremennaya politicheskaya nauka o traektoriyakh razvitiya gosudarstva, biznesa i grazhdanskogo obshchestva: Materialy II Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (g. Minsk, 15-16 dekabrya 2021 g.) / Pod red. N.YU. Veremeeva. Minsk: Kolorgrad, 2021. P. 240-243.
9. Kuryukin A.N. COVID-19 kak vyzov ehkonomike, sotsiumu, politike // MIR. 2020. No. 3.P. 250-265.
10. Wang A. Authoritarianism in the Time of COVID // Harvard International Review. 2020. May 23. URL: https://hir.harvard.edu/covid-authoritarianism/ (дата обращения: 25.01.2023).
11. Guasti P. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Central and Eastern Europe: The Rise of Autocracy and Democratic Resilience // Democratic Theory. 2020. Vol. 7, No. 2. P. 47-60.
12. Ortega F., Orsini M. Governing COVID-19 Without Government in Brazil: Ignorance, Neoliberal Authoritarianism, and the Collapse of Public Health Leadership // Global Public Health. 2020. Vol. 15, No. 9. P. 1257-1277.
13. Todorovic M. Authoritarianism and COVID-19: A Case Study from Serbia // Anthropology Now. 2020. Vol. 12, No. 2. P. 80-85.
14. Badaeva A.S. Pandemicheskie strategii zapadnoevropeiskikh ul'trapravykh partii // Kontury global'nykh transformatsii: politika, ehkonomika, pravo. 2020. No. 5. P. 94-113.
15. Baranov N.A. Vybory kak institut doveriya: osobennosti funktsionirovaniya v usloviyakh pandemii COVID-19 // Upravlencheskoe konsul'tirovanie. 2021. No. 10. P. 10-21.
16. Vorob'eva E.E. Vliyanie ehpidemii COVID-19 na prezidentskie vybory v SSHA v 2020 godu // Publichnaya politika. 2020. No. 2. P. 81-89.
17. Guseva YU.R., Ponomarenko A.A. Osobennosti strategii pravogo populizma v period pandemii SARS-COV-2 (na primere Italii) // Gumanitarnyi nauchnyi vestnik. 2020. No. 12. P. 128-132.
18. Zhade Z.A. Vlast' i obshchestvo pered vyzovom pandemii COVID-19 // Gumanitarnye, sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki. 2021. No. 2. P. 32-37.
19. Wondreys J., Mudde C. Victims of the Pandemic? European Far-Right Parties and COVID-19 // Nationalities Papers. 2022. Vol. 50, No. 1. P. 86-103.
20. Falkenbach M., Greer S.L. Denial and Distraction: How the Populist Radical Right Responds to COVID-19 // International Journal of Health Policy and Management. 2021. Vol. 10, No. 9. P. 578-580.
21. Landman T., Splendore L. Pandemic Democracy: Elections and COVID-19 // Journal of Risk Research. 2020. Vol. 23, No. 7-8. P. 1060-1066.
22. Belov M.A., Kuznetsova O.V. Anti-mask: protestnye dvizheniya v ramkakh bor'by s COVID-19 // Universitetskaya nauka. 2021. No. 1. P. 199-202.
23. Epifanova T.V., Zakaurtseva T.A. Sotsial'nye dvizheniya v period pandemii: noveishaya istoriya protestov // Vestnik Diplomaticheskoi akademii MID Rossii. Rossiya i mir. 2020. No. 4. P. 69-78.
24. Bratich J. «Give Me Liberty or Give Me Covid!»: Anti-Lockdown Protests as Necropopulist Downsurgency // Cultural Studies. 2021. Vol. 35, No. 2-3. P. 257-265.
25. Kowalewski M. Street Protests in Times of COVID-19: Adjusting Tactics and Marching «as Usual» // Social Movement Studies. 2021. Vol. 20, No. 6. P. 758-765.
26. Martin G. Protest, Policing and Law During COVID-19: On the Legality of Mass Gatherings in a Health Crisis // Alternative Law Journal. 2021. Vol. 46, No. 4. P. 275-281.
Review
For citations:
Nefedov S.A., Vladimir D.N., Gandaloev I.I. THE POLITICAL PARTICIPATION DURING THE FIGHT AGAINST COVID- 19: INTERNATIONAL RETROSPECTION. Modern Science and Innovations. 2023;(1):160-166. https://doi.org/10.37493/2307-910X.2023.1.18
Views:
123
Email this article 