The information privileges of political elites in the conditions of social media development
https://doi.org/10.37493/2307-910X.2023.4.22
Abstract
The article presents the results of a study of the influence of social media on the information privileges of political elites. In the ―Introduction‖ section, the author substantiates the relevance of the topic and problem of his research. In his opinion, it is determined by the rapid development of social media, which have become a tool of various political actors who use them to achieve various goals. With the development of social media, political elites face new difficulties in exercising information privileges, but at the same time receive new opportunities for information dominance. The study of the information privileges of political elites is becoming even more relevant in the context of an information war. In the section ―Materials and research methods‖ the author characterizes the empirical and methodological bases of his research. The first includes reports and reports from various research organizations, regulations, etc. The second includes the classical theory of elites, the modern theory of political communication and the modern theory of mediatization of politics. In the ―Literature Review,‖ the author systematizes publications related to the topic and problem of their research. He identifies three groups of works: 1) works that examine the interaction of elites with the mass media, their communication activity and strategies for mastering the information space; 2) works whose authors analyze the influence of social media on the political process; 3) works in which social media are correlated with such an important political science category as the political regime. In the ―Research results and their discussion‖ section, the author formulates a definition of information privileges, understanding them as priority access to the media space, which provides significant opportunities in the field of information dominance. He argues that, firstly, social media acts as a factor preventing political elites from exercising information privileges, because imply practices that contradict elite models of managing society, and secondly, that in order to realize information privileges and maintain their socio-political status in general, political elites are currently using two ―reactive‖ and one ―proactive‖ strategies. The author emphasizes that in conditions of political crises, through social media, the opposition is trying to eliminate the communication monopoly of political elites. The authors also point out that in the ―post-truth‖world, political elites receive new opportunities to exercise their information privileges. However, ―post-truth‖ circulating in the space of social media also determines the formation of opposition centers of information gravity. Using the latest data, he comes to the conclusion that the hybrid war unleashed against Russia involves the involvement of existing and the formation of new hostile centers of information gravity, the key task of which is precisely to undermine the information dominance of the Russian elite, and then to create and manage internal crises, in destabilizing the political regime in the country. In the ―Conclusion‖ section, the author summarizes his research, briefly listing the results obtained.
About the Author
E. I. KutsaenkoRussian Federation
Ekaterina I. Kutsaenko – Assistant Professor
9, Kalinin Avenue, Pyatigorsk, 357532
References
1. Mosca G. Elementi di Scienza Politica. Torino: Fratelli Bocca; 1923 (In Ital.).
2. Michels R. Zur Sociologie des Parteiwesens in der Modernen Demokratie: Untersuchungen uber die Oligarchischen Tendenzen des Gruppenlebens. Leipzig: Werner Klinkhardt; 1911 (In Germ.).
3. Pareto V. Compendio di Sociologia Generale. Firenze: G. Barbera; 1920.
4. Mills CW. The Power Elite. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1956.
5. Domhoff GW. Who Rules America? Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1967.
6. Wolfsfeld G. Making Sense of Media and Politics: Five Principles in Political Communication. Abingdon: Routledge; 2011.
7. Stromback J, Esser F. Mediatization of Politics: Towards a Theoretical Framework. Mediatization of Politics: Understanding the Transformation of Western Democracies. Ed. by F. Esser, J. Stromback. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2014. P. 3-30.
8. Botasheva AK, Anufrienko SV. Mediapoliticheskii protsess kak faktor vliyaniya na sobytiinuyu storonu politicheskoi zhizni (na primere sobytii na Ukraine 2014-2015 gg.). Vestnik Pyatigorskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2019;217-223. (In Russ.).
9. Aelst PV, Walgrave S. Information and Arena: The Dual Function of the News Media for Political Elites. How Political Actors Use the Media: A Functional Analysis of the Media‘s Role in Politics. Ed. by P.V. Aelst, S. Walgrave. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. P. 1-20.
10. Zoizner A. The Consequences of Strategic News Coverage for Democracy: A Meta-Analysis. Communication Research. 2021;48(1):3-25.
11. Sevenans J. How Mass Media Attract Political Elites‘ Attention. European Journal of Political Research. 2018;57(1):153-170.
12. Green-Pedersen C, Mortensen PB, Thesen G. The Incumbency Bonus Revisited: Causes and Consequences of Media Dominance. British Journal of Political Science. 2017;47(1):131-148.
13. Efanova EV. Sotsial'nye media v amerikanskoi publichnoi politike (na primere sotsial'noi seti Twitter). Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 4: Istoriya. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2020;3:172-179. (In Russ.).
14. Klyuchnikov DD. Osobennosti sotsial'nykh media v sovremennykh politicheskikh protsessakh. Sotsial'nogumanitarnye znaniya. 2021;1:308-314. (In Russ.).
15. Shestova TL, Kuz'min VA. Znachenie «novykh media» v sovremennom politicheskom protsesse. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 27: Globalistika i geopolitika. 2019;2:69-77. (In Russ.).
16. Barnidge M. et al. Social Media as a Sphere for ―Risky: Political Expression: A Twenty-Country MultiLevel Comparative Analysis. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 2018;23(2):161-182.
17. Velasquez A, Rojas H. Political Expression on Social Media: The Role of Communication Competence and Expected Outcomes. Social Media + Society. 2017;3(1):1-13.
18. Song H, Gil de Zuniga H, Boomgaarden HG. Social Media News Use and Political Cynicism: Differential Pathways Through ―News Finds Me‖ Perception. Mass Communication and Society. 2020;21(1):47-70.
19. Tromble R. Thanks for (Actually) Responding! How Citizen Demand Shapes Politicians‘ Interactive Practices on Twitter. New Media & Society. 2018;20(2):676-697.
20. Bardakov AI, Krivosheeva NI. Demokraticheskii potentsial sotsial'nykh media. Paradigmy upravleniya, ekonomiki i prava. 2020;2:11-17. (In Russ.).
21. Samarin YaV. Demokratiya v usloviyakh setevogo obshchestva: problemy i perspektivy. Politicheskaya ekspertiza: POLITEKS. 2020;2:251-262. (In Russ.).
22. Bradshaw S, Howard PN. Social Media and Democracy in Crisis. Society and the Internet: How Networks of Information and Communication are Changing Our Lives. Ed. by M. Graham, WH. Dutton. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019. P. 212-227.
23. Kumar Jha C, Kodila-Tedika O. Does Social Media Promote Democracy? Some Empirical Evidence. Journal of Policy Modeling. 2020;42(2):271-290.
24. Persily N, Tucker JA. Introduction. Social Media and Democracy: The State of the Field and Prospects for Reform. Ed. by N. Persily, JA. Tucker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2020. P. 1-9.
25. Pankratov SA, Morozov SI, Gavrilov SD. Protestnaya aktivnost' sovremennoi molodezhi v kontekste institutsionalizatsii tsifrovoi politiki. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 4: Istoriya. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2022;1:213-224. (In Russ.).
26. Mal'kevich AA. Rol' sotsial'nykh setei v protestnom politicheskom uchastii. Upravlencheskoe konsul'tirovanie. 2020;1:35-42. (In Russ.).
27. Novikova KA. Evolyutsiya faktora sotsial'nykh media v protestakh na territorii Ispanii. Voprosy natsional'nykh i federativnykh otnoshenii. 2021;3:925-932. (In Russ.).
28. Surguladze VSh. Sotsial'nye media – instrument sotsial'no-politicheskoi destabilizatsii obshchestva: ugrozy, tendentsii, perspektivy. Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta. 2020;1:6-13. (In Russ.).
29. Benrazek Y. The Role of Social Media as a Public Sphere in the Algerian Protests: An Analytical Study. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research. 2022;51:2:153-173.
30. Boulianne S, Koc-Michalska K, Bimber B. Mobilizing Media: Comparing TV and Social Media Effects on Protest Mobilization. Information, Communication & Society. 2020;23(5):642-664.
31. Valenzuela S. Unpacking the Use of Social Media for Protest Behavior: The Roles of Information, Opinion Expression, and Activism. American Behavioral Scientist. 2013;57(7):920-942.
32. Poell T. Social Media, Temporality, and the Legitimacy of Protest. Social Movement Studies. 2020;19:5-6:609-624.
Review
For citations:
Kutsaenko E.I. The information privileges of political elites in the conditions of social media development. Modern Science and Innovations. 2023;(4):186-192. https://doi.org/10.37493/2307-910X.2023.4.22