THE POLITICAL ELITE AND ITS INFORMATIONAL PRIVILEGES
https://doi.org/10.33236/2307-910X-2019-3-27-157-165
Abstract
The development of the information society has an impact on the most important sphere of life of modern society, the political sphere, contributing to the development of political technologies. These phenomena undoubtedly include the political elite, which is forced to adapt to new circumstances, to the opportunities that have opened up with them and the obstacles that have arisen. In particular, the development of social media threatens its information privileges.
About the Authors
S. A. Nefedov
Pyatigorsk State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
E. I. Kutsaenko
Pyatigorsk State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Diderot D., Mallet E.-F. Elite / / Encyclopedie ou Dictionnaire Raisonne des Sciences, des Arts et des Metiers. En 28 Volumes. Vol. 5 / Ed. par D. Diderot, J.R. d'Alembert. Paris: Briasson; David; Le Breton; Durand, 1755. P. 509.
2. Парето В. Компендиум по общей социологии. М.: ГУ ВШЭ, 2008. С. 307-308.
3. Там же. С. 309.
4. Parry G. Political Elites. Colchester: ECPR Press, 2005. P. 13.
5. Moore G. The Structure of a National Elite Network // American Sociological Review. 1979. Vol. 44. № 5. P. 674.
6. Higley J., Burton M.G. The Elite Variable in Democratic Transitions and Breakdowns // American Sociological Review. 1989. Vol. 54. № 1. P. 18.
7. Yamokoski A., Dubrow J.K. How Do Elites Define Influence? Personality and Respect as Sources of Social Power // Sociological Focus. 2008. Vol. 48. № 4. P. 319.
8. Araya I.A. Comparative Political Elites // Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance / Ed. by A. Farazmand. Cham: Springer, 2018.
9. Michels R. Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. Kitchener: Batoche Books, 2001. P. 241.
10. Там же. P. 28-29.
11. Mosca G. The Ruling Class. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1939. P. 60-61.
12. Pareto V. The Rise and Fall of Elites: Application of Theoretical Sociology. Abingdon: Routledge, 2017. P. 59.
13. Mosca G. The Ruling Class. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1939. P. 71-72.
14. Там же. P. 391.
15. Mills C.W. The Power Elite. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1956.
16. Domhoff G.W. Who Rules America? Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1967.
17. Манхейм К. Человек и общество в эпоху преобразований // Манхейм К. Диагноз нашего времени: Сборник / Под ред. Я.М. Бергера и др. М.: Юрист, 1994. С. 314, 322.
18. Dahrendorf R. Eine Neue Deutsche Oberschict? Notizen uber die Eliten der Bundesrepublik // Die Neue Gesellschaft. 1962. Vol. 9. № 1. S. 18-31.
19. Keller S. Beyond the Ruling Class: Strategic Elite in Modern Society. New York: Random House, 1963.
20. Dahl R.A. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1971.
21. Dahl R.A. Who Governs?: Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1961.
22. Putnam R.D. The Comparative Study of Political Elites. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1976.
23. Например, Matthews M. Privilege in the Soviet Union: A Study of Elite Life-Styles under Communism. London: G. Allen and Unwin, 1978.
24. Huntington S.P. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991.
25. Burton M.G., Higley J. Elite Settlements // American Sociological Review. 1987. Vol. 52. № 3. P. 295-307; Higley J., Burton M.G. The Elite Variable in Democratic Transitions and Breakdowns // American Sociological Review. 1989. Vol. 54. № 1. P. 17-32.
26. Higley J., Burton M. Elite Foundations of Liberal Democracy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006. P. 1-32.
27. Burton M., Gunther R., Higley J. Introduction: Elite Transformations and Democratic Regimes // Elites and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe / Ed. by J. Higley, R. Gunther. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. P. 1-37.
28. Dijk T.A.V. Power and the News Media // Political Communication in Action: States, Institutions, Movements, Audiences / Ed. by D.L. Paletz. Cresskill: Hampton Press, 1996. P. 11-13.
29. Tuchman G. Making News: A Study in the Construction of Reality. New York: Free Press, 1978; Gans H.J. Deciding What's News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. New York: Pantheon Books, 1979.
30. Aelst P.V., Walgrave S. Information and Arena: The Dual Function of the News Media for Political Elites // How Political Actors Use the Media: A Functional Analysis of the Media's Role in Politics / Ed. by P.V. Aelst, S. Walgrave. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. P. 1-20.
31. Baumgartner F.R., Jones B.D. The Politics of Information: Problem Definition and the Course of Public Policy in America. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2015. P. 5-18.
32. Kingdon J.W. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policy. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2014. P. 60.
33. Glynn C.J. et al. Public Opinion. Abingdon: Routledge, 2018. P. 330-384.
34. Reich Z. The Anatomy of Leaks: Tracing the Path of Unauthorized Disclosure in the Israeli Press // Journalism. 2008. Vol. 9. № 5. P. 555-581.
35. Eissler R., Russell A., Jones B.D. New Avenues for the Study of Agenda Setting // Policy Studies Journal. 2014. Vol. 42. № 1. P. 71-86.
36. Thesen G. When Good News Is Scare and Bad News Is Good: Government Responsibilities and Opposition Possibilities in Political Agenda-Setting // European Journal of Political Research. 2013. Vol. 52. № 3. P. 364-389.
37. Bonafont L.C., Baumgartner F.R. Newspaper Attention and Policy Activities in Spain // Journal of Public Policy. 2013. Vol. 33. № 1. P. 65-88.
38. Midtbo T. et al. Do the Media Set the Agenda of Parliament or Is It the Other Way Around? Agenda Interactions between MPs and Mass Media // Representing the People: A Survey among Members of Statewide and Sub-State Parliaments / Ed. by K. Deschouwer, S. Depauw. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. P. 188-208.
39. Pas D.V.D. Making Hay While the Sun Shines: Do Parties Only Respond to Media Attention When the Framing Is Right? // The International Journal of Press/Politics. 2014. Vol. 19. № 1. P. 42-65.
40. Stromback J., Esser F. Mediatization of Politics: Towards a Theoretical Framework // Mediatization of Politics: Understanding the Transformation of Western Democracies / Ed. by F. Esser, J. Stromback. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. P. 330.
41. Stromback J., Aelst P.V. Why Political Parties Adapt to the Media: Exploring the Fourth Dimension of Mediatization // International Communication Gazette. 2013. Vol. 75. № 4. P. 341-358.
42. Bennett W.L. News: The Politics of Illusion. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2016. P. 89-123.
43. Schaffner B.F., Sellers P.J. Introduction // Winning with Words: The Origin and Impact of Political Framing / Ed. by B. F. Schaffner, P.J. Sellers. Abingdon: Routledge, 2010. P. 1-8; Waismel-Manor I., Tsfati Y. Why Do Better-Looking Members of Congress Receive More Television Coverage? // Political Communication. 2011. Vol. 28. № 4. P. 440-463.
44. Wolfsfeld G. Making Sense of Media and Politics: Five Principles in Political Communication. Abingdon: Routledge, 2011. P. 7-44.
45. Lieber P.S., Golan G.J. Political Public Relations, News Management, and Agenda Indexing // Political Public Relations: Principles and Applications / Ed. by J. Stromback, S. Kiousis. Abingdon: Routledge, 2011. P. 54-74.
46. Hanggli R. Key Factors in Frame Building: How Strategic Political Actors Shape News Media Coverage // American Behavioral Scientist. 2012. Vol. 56. № 3. P. 300-317.
47. Gubitz S.R. et al. Political Dynamics of Framing // New Directions in Media and Politics / Ed. by T.N. Ridout. Abingdon: Routledge, 2019. P. 36-38.
Review
For citations:
Nefedov S.A., Kutsaenko E.I. THE POLITICAL ELITE AND ITS INFORMATIONAL PRIVILEGES. Modern Science and Innovations. 2019;(3):149-156. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33236/2307-910X-2019-3-27-157-165
Views:
90
Email this article 