THE ANALYSIS OF THE THEORY OF SOCIAL CAPITAL ON THE EXAMPLE OF ASIAN AND EUROPEAN COUNTRIES: COMPARATIVE APPROACH
Abstract
In the present article deals with the theory of social capital, including the theory of dictatorship. The authors present the evolution of the Asian socialist countries, the interaction between state institutions, the political community, civil society and the corporate economy. Comparing the model and the political configuration in the countries of Asia (China, South Korea, Thailand) and Italy concluded that civilian cooperation at an unacceptably low level, gives the model of political participation «clientelistic» character, mends obstacles the development of democracy.
About the Authors
Arushan Arushanovich Vartumyan
NCFU
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander Valerievich Polyakov
Armavir State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Paldam M., Svendsen G. T. Trust, Social Capital and Economic Growth: An International Comparison. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. UK. 2003. - P. 5.
2. Hui W. The 1989 Social Movement and the Historical Roots of China's Neoliberalism//China's New Order. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 2003. - Р. 199.
3. Kawata J. Social Capital, Trust, and Democracy: Asia in Comparative Perspective. Konan Low Review, 2005. vol. 26. - Р. 203.
4. Senghaas D. The Clash within Civilizations: Coming to terms with cultural conflicts. London: Routledge, 2002. - Р. 112-113.
5. Petras J. Rulers and Ruled in the US Empire: Bankers, Zionists, Militants, Atlanta. GA: Clarity Press, 2007. - Р. 147.
6. Graziano L. A Conceptual Framework for the Study of Cliettelism. Cornell University Western Societies Program Occasional Paper № 2, New York, 1975. - Р. 36-38.
7. Banfield E. C. The Moral Basis of a Backward Society. New York: Free Press, 1958. - Р. 32.
8. Almond G. A., Verba S. he Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1963. - Р. 56.
9. Putnam R. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993.
10. Piattoni S. Virtuous Clientelism//Italy's «Southern Question»: Orientalism in One Country. Oxford:Berg, 2005. - Р. 229.
11. Piattoni S. Virtuous Clientelism//Italy's «Southern Question»: Orientalism in One Country. Oxford: Berg, 2005. - Р. 239.
12. Coleman J. S. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital//American Journal of Sociology, 1988, vol. 94. - Р. 114.
13. Colman J. S. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990. - P. 307.
14. Bourdieu P. he Forms of Capital//Handbook of heory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press, 1997. - P. 248-249.
15. Грановеттер M. Сила слабых связей // Экономическая социология. Т.10. № 4, сентябрь 2009. - С. 31-51.
Review
For citations:
Vartumyan A.A., Polyakov A.V. THE ANALYSIS OF THE THEORY OF SOCIAL CAPITAL ON THE EXAMPLE OF ASIAN AND EUROPEAN COUNTRIES: COMPARATIVE APPROACH. Modern Science and Innovations. 2015;(4):166-172. (In Russ.)
Views:
81
Email this article 