CONCEPTUAL APPROACHES TO THE DEFINITION OF "PARTY" IN TURKISH POLITICAL SCIENCE
Abstract
The article presents comparative analysis of the definitions of «party», proposed by the Turkish experts, with the most famous in modern political science approaches to the deinition of this concept.
About the Author
Rezvan Shirvaniyevich Khasanov
North-Caucasus Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Большой Энциклопедический словарь. 1997. Большой Энциклопедический словарь. URL: http://www.vedu. ru/bigencdic/44700/
2. Ефремова Т. Е. 2000. Новый словарь русского языка. Толково-словообразовательный. URL: http://slovar.cc/ rus/efremova-tolk/361333.html
3. Заславский С. Е. (ред.). 2007. Основы теории политических партий. М.: Европа. 264 с.
4. Михельс Р. 1990. Социология политических партий в условиях демократии // Антология мировой политической мысли. Т. 2. Зарубежная политическая мысль XX в. М.: Мысль. 832 с.
5. Шлыков В. И. Поиск политического равновесия. Эволюция партийной системы Турции в период Третьей Республики (1983-2009) Перспективы. Фонд исторической перспективы. URL: http://www.perspektivy.info/book/poisk_ politicheskogo_ravnovesija_evolucija_partijnoj_sistemy_turcii_v_period_tretjej_respubliki_1983-2009_2009-07-03.htm
6. Энциклопедический словарь экономики и права. 2000. Академик. URL: http://enc-dic.com/ozhegov/ Organizacij a-20504.html
7. Ak^ali N. 1988. Siyaset Bilimine Giri§. Izmir: Bilgehan Basimevi. 170 р.
8. Altinta§ H. Türk siyasal sisteminde siyasal partiler ve kentle§menin kutupla§ma sürecine etkileri. Akdeniz I.I.B.F. Dergisi (5) 2003. Р. 2-4.
9. Beume K von. (1982). Partien In Westlichen Demokratien. München: Piper. 520 р.
10. CHP Egitim el kitabi (2012). Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi. URL: https://www.tbmm.gov.tr/eyayin/gazeteler/ web/kutuphanede%20bulunan%20dijital%20kaynaklar/kitaplar/siyasi%20parti%20yayinlari/200400296%20chp%20 egitim%20el%20kitabi/200400296%20chp%20egitim%20el%20kitabi%200000-0008%20giris.pdf
11. Kapani M. (2008). Politika Bilimine Giri§. Ankara: Bilgi Yayinevi. 253 р.
12. Lawson K. (1976). The Comparative Study of Political Parties. New York: St.Martins Press. 512 р.
13. Newmann S. (1957). Toward a Comparative Study of Political Parties // Modern Political Parties. Approaches to Comparative Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 396 р.
14. Özbudun E. (1964) M. Duverger'in «siyasal partiler»i ve siyasal partilerin incelenmesinde bazi metodolojik problemler. Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi. URL: http://auhf.ankara.edu.tr/dergiler/auhfd-arsiv/AUHF-1964-21-01-04/AUHF-1964-21-01-04-Ozbudun.pdf
15. Özbudun E. (1979). Siyasal Partiler. Ankara: Sevin^ Matbaasi.
16. SARIBAY A. (2000). Global Bir Baki§la Politik Sosyoloji. Istanbul: Alfa Yayinlari. 197 р.
17. Sartori G. (1976). Parties and Party Systems. A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 383 р.
18. Siyasi partiler kanunu. (1983). Mevzuat. URL: http://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/F5.2820.pdf
19. Siyasal partiler. Siyasal ileti^im enstitüsü. URL: http://www.siyasaliletisim.org/index.php/sie-modul/307-siyasal-partiler.html
20. Tunaya T. (1979). Siyasi Müesseseler ve Anayasa Hukuku. Istanbul: Istanbul Yayinevi.
Review
For citations:
Khasanov R.Sh. CONCEPTUAL APPROACHES TO THE DEFINITION OF "PARTY" IN TURKISH POLITICAL SCIENCE. Modern Science and Innovations. 2016;(4):261-267. (In Russ.)
Views:
57
Email this article 