msiСовременная наука и инновацииModern Science and Innovations2307-910XNorth-Caucasus Federal Universitymsi-999Research ArticleПОЛИТОЛОГИЯPOLITICAL SCIENCESОСОБЕННОСТИ ВНУТРЕННИХ ФАКТОРОВ ВЛИЯНИЯ НА ВНЕШНЮЮ ПОЛИТИКУ СОВРЕМЕННОГО ГОСУДАРСТВАTHE EFFECTS OF INTERNAL FACTORS ON MODERN STATE’S FOREIGN POLICYБалаховаЗалина ОлеговнаBalakhovaZalina Olegovnabalakhova@gmail.comПятигорский Государственный Лингвистический УниверситетРоссияPyatigorsk State Linguistic UniversityRussian Federation20161110202203276282Copyright © Балахова З.О., 20222022Балахова З.О.Balakhova Z.O.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://msi.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/999

Статья основана на эмпирических данных и аналитическом материале, анализируется международная политическая реальность. В статье рассматриваются теории, изучающих внутренние факторы влияния на внешнюю политику. Было оценено влияние таких факторов как: общественное мнение, групп интересов, политических партий, политического режима, общества и бюрократической системы. Полученные выводы доказывают стабильность политической системы, эффективность информационных ресурсов, а также способность успешно разнообразить интересы различных социальных групп внутри страны при сохранении поддержки ключевых секторов общества, что и является основными факторами отечественной внешней политики в настоящее время

This article, based on empiricism and analytical material analyzes the international political reality. The article deals with the theories studying the internal factors of influence on foreign policy. The impact of such determinants as public opinion, interest groups, political parties, political regime, society and bureaucratic system was assessed. The obtained conclusions based on the analysis proved that the stability of political system, the effectiveness of information resources, and ability to vary interests of different social groups within the country while maintaining the support of key sectors of society successfully are the main domestic factors of foreign policy nowadays

внешняя политикафакторный анализмеждународная системаобщественное мнениезаинтересованные группыполитические партиибюрократизмforeign policyfactor analysisinternational systempublic opinioninterest groupspolitical partiesbureaucratismReferencesКулагин В. Политические режимы и внешняя политика. ProetContra, 8: 1. 2003.Кулагин В. Политические режимы и внешняя политика. ProetContra, 8: 1. 2003.Радько Т. Н., Лазарев В. В., Морозова Л. А. Теория государства и права: учебник для бакалавров. Изд.: ООО «Проспект», 2013. 637 с.Радько Т. Н., Лазарев В. В., Морозова Л. А. Теория государства и права: учебник для бакалавров. Изд.: ООО «Проспект», 2013. 637 с.Рукавишников В. О. Холодная война. Холодный мир. Общественное мнение в США и Европе о ССР/России, внешней политике и безопасности Запада. М.: Академический Проект, 2005. С. 12, 13, 815.Рукавишников В. О. Холодная война. Холодный мир. Общественное мнение в США и Европе о ССР/России, внешней политике и безопасности Запада. М.: Академический Проект, 2005. С. 12, 13, 815.Сирота Н. М. Политология. Курс лекций. Изд.: «Питер», 2006. 270 с.Сирота Н. М. Политология. Курс лекций. Изд.: «Питер», 2006. 270 с.Цыганков П. Внешняя политика и общественное мнение // Обозреватель. 2008. № 7.Цыганков П. Внешняя политика и общественное мнение // Обозреватель. 2008. № 7.Alastair I. Johnston. Thinking about Strategic Culture. International Security 19. Winter 1995: 32-64; Thomas U. Berger, Cultures of Antimilitarism: National Security in Germany and Japan Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.Alastair I. Johnston. Thinking about Strategic Culture. International Security 19. Winter 1995: 32-64; Thomas U. Berger, Cultures of Antimilitarism: National Security in Germany and Japan Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.Benjamin I. Page and Robert Y. Shapiro, The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1992; Philip Everts and Pierangelo Isernia, eds., Public Opinion and the International Use of Force. New York, NY: Routledge, 2001.Benjamin I. Page and Robert Y. Shapiro, The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1992; Philip Everts and Pierangelo Isernia, eds., Public Opinion and the International Use of Force. New York, NY: Routledge, 2001.Brian C. Rathbun, Partisan Interventions: European Party Politics and Peace Enforcement in the Balkans. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2004; Jean-Philippe Therien and Alain Noel. Political Parties and Foreign Aid. American Political Science Review 94. Spring 2000: 151-62.Brian C. Rathbun, Partisan Interventions: European Party Politics and Peace Enforcement in the Balkans. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2004; Jean-Philippe Therien and Alain Noel. Political Parties and Foreign Aid. American Political Science Review 94. Spring 2000: 151-62.Giacomo Benedetto and Simon Hix. The Rejected, the Ejected, and the Dejected: Explaining Government Rebels in the 2001-2005 British House of Commons. Comparative Political Studies 40 (2007): 755-81.Giacomo Benedetto and Simon Hix. The Rejected, the Ejected, and the Dejected: Explaining Government Rebels in the 2001-2005 British House of Commons. Comparative Political Studies 40 (2007): 755-81.Graham T. Allison, Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 1971; Morton H. Halperin, Bureaucratic Politics and Foreign Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1974; M. Hollis and S. Smith. Roles and Reasons in Foreign Policy Decision Making. British Journal of Political Science 16. 1986: 269-86; John Davis. Infighting in Washington: The Impact of Bureaucratic Politics on U.S. Iraq Policy. in Presidential Policies and the Road to the Second War in Iraq, ed. John Davis. London, UK: Ashgate, 2006, 92-122.Graham T. Allison, Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 1971; Morton H. Halperin, Bureaucratic Politics and Foreign Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1974; M. Hollis and S. Smith. Roles and Reasons in Foreign Policy Decision Making. British Journal of Political Science 16. 1986: 269-86; John Davis. Infighting in Washington: The Impact of Bureaucratic Politics on U.S. Iraq Policy. in Presidential Policies and the Road to the Second War in Iraq, ed. John Davis. London, UK: Ashgate, 2006, 92-122.Hank C. Jenkins-Smith et al. Foreign and Domestic Policy Belief Structures in the U.S. and British Publics. Journal of Conflict Resolution 48. 2004: 287-309.Hank C. Jenkins-Smith et al. Foreign and Domestic Policy Belief Structures in the U.S. and British Publics. Journal of Conflict Resolution 48. 2004: 287-309.Joe D. Hagan, Political Opposition and Foreign Policy in Comparative Perspective. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1993; Thomas Risse-Kappen. Public Opinion, Domestic Structure, and Foreign Policy in Liberal Democracies. World Politics 43. 1991: 479-512.Joe D. Hagan, Political Opposition and Foreign Policy in Comparative Perspective. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1993; Thomas Risse-Kappen. Public Opinion, Domestic Structure, and Foreign Policy in Liberal Democracies. World Politics 43. 1991: 479-512.Juliet Kaarbo and Ryan Beasley. Taking it to the Extreme: The Effect of Coalition Cabinets on Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy Analysis 4. Spring 2008: 67-81.Juliet Kaarbo and Ryan Beasley. Taking it to the Extreme: The Effect of Coalition Cabinets on Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy Analysis 4. Spring 2008: 67-81.Kogan, N. The Politics of Italian Foreign Policy, New York, The Free Press. 1963.Kogan, N. The Politics of Italian Foreign Policy, New York, The Free Press. 1963.Kulagin V. In Search of a Causal Nexus Between Political Regimes and Foreign Policy Strategies in the Post-Soviet Environment. 2004. ПОЛИТОЛОГИЯKulagin V. In Search of a Causal Nexus Between Political Regimes and Foreign Policy Strategies in the Post-Soviet Environment. 2004. ПОЛИТОЛОГИЯMansfield E, Snyder J. Democratization and the Danger of War. - International Security. 1995.Mansfield E, Snyder J. Democratization and the Danger of War. - International Security. 1995.Martin W. Sampson III. Cultural Influences on Foreign Policy. in New Directions in the Study of Foreign Policy, ed. Charles F. Hermann, Charles W. Kegley Jr., and James N. Rosenau. Boston, MA: Allen and Unwin, 1987, 384-405.Martin W. Sampson III. Cultural Influences on Foreign Policy. in New Directions in the Study of Foreign Policy, ed. Charles F. Hermann, Charles W. Kegley Jr., and James N. Rosenau. Boston, MA: Allen and Unwin, 1987, 384-405.Ole R. Holsti. Public Opinion and Foreign Policy Analysis. in Millenial Reflections on International Studies, eds. Michael Brecher and F. Harvey. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press, 2002, 514-28.Ole R. Holsti. Public Opinion and Foreign Policy Analysis. in Millenial Reflections on International Studies, eds. Michael Brecher and F. Harvey. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press, 2002, 514-28.Shibley Telhami. Arab Public Opinion and the Gulf War" Political Science Quarterly 108 (1993): 437-52.Shibley Telhami. Arab Public Opinion and the Gulf War" Political Science Quarterly 108 (1993): 437-52.Stephen D. Krasner, Defending the National Interest: Raw Materials Investments and U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1978; Jack Snyder, Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991.Stephen D. Krasner, Defending the National Interest: Raw Materials Investments and U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1978; Jack Snyder, Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991.Stephen G. Walker, Role Theory and Foreign Policy Analysis. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1987; Jeffrey S. Lantis and Darryl Howlett. Culture and National Security Policy,” in Strategy in the Contemporary World, eds. John Baylis, James Wirtz, Eliot Cohen, and Colin S. Gray, 3rd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2010.Stephen G. Walker, Role Theory and Foreign Policy Analysis. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1987; Jeffrey S. Lantis and Darryl Howlett. Culture and National Security Policy,” in Strategy in the Contemporary World, eds. John Baylis, James Wirtz, Eliot Cohen, and Colin S. Gray, 3rd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2010.Steve Chan and William S. Safran. Public Opinion as a Constraint Against War: Democracies’ Responses to Operation Iraqi Freedom. Foreign Policy Analysis 2 (2006): 137-56.Steve Chan and William S. Safran. Public Opinion as a Constraint Against War: Democracies’ Responses to Operation Iraqi Freedom. Foreign Policy Analysis 2 (2006): 137-56.Valerie M. Hudson, ed., Culture and Foreign Policy (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1997).Valerie M. Hudson, ed., Culture and Foreign Policy (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1997).Wallace, William, Foreign Policy and Political Process, London: Macmillan Press Ltd. 1971.Wallace, William, Foreign Policy and Political Process, London: Macmillan Press Ltd. 1971.Zeev Maoz and Bruce Russett. Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946-1986. American Political Science Review 87. 1993: 624-38; John M. Owen. How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace. International Security 19. Fall 1994: 87-125.Zeev Maoz and Bruce Russett. Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946-1986. American Political Science Review 87. 1993: 624-38; John M. Owen. How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace. International Security 19. Fall 1994: 87-125.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.